On 12/04/2009 07:07 PM, Vincent Beffara wrote:
>/vincent (offlineimap package maintainer)
>
Heh, I totally missed that :)
Peter
--
Peter O'Gorman
http://pogma.com
--
Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual
On Dec 4, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Fink on 10.6 really wants to keep /sw/var/lib/fink/path-prefix-10.6 at the
> beginning of PATH.
Fixed it just now. Oddly, for some reason I did run into this problem on my
10.6 32-bit testing.
---
fixed it. Sorry.
On Dec 4, 2009, at 5:05 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
> Thanks. Now it's clear which checksum is causing the issue. It looks
> like the stable patch file didn't get updated to be in sync with that in
> unstable.
>
> $ md5 /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci/coot.patch
On 12/04/2009 07:07 PM, Vincent Beffara wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Offlineimap (fink unstable, either 64 or 32 bit) fails with a "Trace/BPT
>> Trap error" on 10.6.
>
Please give this one a try and let me know if it works for you.
If so, I will let the maintainer know and give him a few days to respond.
Hi,
> Offlineimap (fink unstable, either 64 or 32 bit) fails with a "Trace/BPT
> Trap error" on 10.6.
Just upgraded myself, and immediately got the same problem. So much for
the "it's in an interpreted language, it should work everywhere" line :-(
> What are the plans for incorporating this fi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bryan W. Lepore wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>> How about actually giving us a sample of your output? Short
>> descriptions of a problem are rarely more illuminating than actually
>> cutting and pasting a verbatim transcript.
Nathaniel Echols wrote:
[]
> I am getting a completely different error on 10.6:
>
> checking for GtkGLExt - version >= 1.0.0... no
> *** Could not run GtkGLExt test program, checking why...
[]
> ld: warning: in /sw/lib/libgtkglext-x11-1.0.dylib, file is not of
> required architecture
The reason
I tried updating to 10.6 this week. I'm now downgrading back to 10.5.
There were lots of little issues, but one in particular (and what turned
out to be the main issue for me) is of interest to this list.
Offlineimap (fink unstable, either 64 or 32 bit) fails with a "Trace/BPT
Trap error" on 10.6
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> How about actually giving us a sample of your output? Short
> descriptions of a problem are rarely more illuminating than actually
> cutting and pasting a verbatim transcript.
well, you know what ESR says, but its not too long :
fink update-all
In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bryan W. Lepore wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>> Only in the initial setup choice of 32 bit or 64 bit on 10.5 or 10.6, on
>> Intel.
>
> huh.
>
>> You mentioned in your message a version of coot that is _not_ the
>> current one
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> Only in the initial setup choice of 32 bit or 64 bit on 10.5 or 10.6, on
> Intel.
huh.
> You mentioned in your message a version of coot that is _not_ the
> current one.
i mentioned 0.6-pre because it works. coot-0.6.0-1 is not building. ...
(trie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bryan W. Lepore wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>>> mailto:alexanderk.han...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> If you haven't selfupdated lately, then do that, since coot just got
>>> updated last night.
>>> I always run selfupdate be
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>> mailto:alexanderk.han...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> If you haven't selfupdated lately, then do that, since coot just got
>> updated last night.
>> I always run selfupdate before upgrading or installing any packages -
>> Doesn't fix the problem.
> I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nathaniel Echols wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Alexander Hansen
> mailto:alexanderk.han...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> It sounds like coot was trying to build as 64-bit or universal on your
> system, then.
>
> If you haven't selfupd
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Alexander Hansen <
alexanderk.han...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It sounds like coot was trying to build as 64-bit or universal on your
> system, then.
>
> If you haven't selfupdated lately, then do that, since coot just got
> updated last night.
I always run selfupdate b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nathaniel Echols wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Alexander Hansen
> mailto:alexanderk.han...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Are you on 32-bit or 64-bit Fink?
>
>
> 32-bit
>
> Does config.log show something that actually says "error"?
>
>
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Alexander Hansen <
alexanderk.han...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are you on 32-bit or 64-bit Fink?
>
32-bit
Does config.log show something that actually says "error"?
>
After the GtkGlExt test:
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
distcc[86856] ERROR: compile conftest.c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nathaniel Echols wrote:
> I am getting a completely different error on 10.6:
>
> checking for GtkGLExt - version >= 1.0.0... no
> *** Could not run GtkGLExt test program, checking why...
> *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nathaniel Echols wrote:
>
> I am getting a completely different error on 10.6:
>
> checking for GtkGLExt - version >= 1.0.0... no
> *** Could not run GtkGLExt test program, checking why...
> *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the f
There is a flag you can set when compiling hdf that tells it that it has netcdf
already (I would have to look it up). That is not getting defined in the hdf
build, is my guess. Look at the the hdf config files and make certain that it
is defined.
-Roy
On Dec 4, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Jean-Frédé
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Bryan W. Lepore
wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:38:00 -0500
> From: Bryan W. Lepore
> To: c...@jiscmail.ac.uk
>
> [ mac osx 10.4 fink 0.29.9 ]
> [ reading WG Scott OSX wiki]
> [ coot 0.6-pre installs OK on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jean-Frédéric Lebrun wrote:
> Strange indeed, I did all the update and re-install netcdf libs... and
> it still have the same prob...
>
> should I try to remove all the /sw dir and reinstall all fink ... when
> I'll have time to do it !!! I'll keep in
Strange indeed, I did all the update and re-install netcdf libs...
and it still have the same prob...
should I try to remove all the /sw dir and reinstall all fink ...
when I'll have time to do it !!! I'll keep in touch with you if it
solves the prob...
let me know if you've got an idea befo
Jean-Frédéric Lebrun wrote:
> Sorry for the missing info...
>
> it's Mac OS 10.4.11 with Xcode version 2.5
>
> here is the result of the command :
> pc242vl2:~ jflebrun$ xcodebuild -version
> Component versions: DevToolsCore-798.0; DevToolsSupport-794.0
>
> Sorry I don't know exactly where starts
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 01:04:55PM -0500, Richard Cobbe wrote:
> Mac OS X 10.6.2, XCode 3.2.1. Fink 0.29.10, tracking unstable source
> (64bit).
>
> I just upgraded to Snow Leopard and did an erase-and-install, so I'm
> setting up Fink from a blank slate. The lbdb package (0.36-1) fails to
> comp
Mac OS X 10.6.2, XCode 3.2.1. Fink 0.29.10, tracking unstable source
(64bit).
I just upgraded to Snow Leopard and did an erase-and-install, so I'm
setting up Fink from a blank slate. The lbdb package (0.36-1) fails to
compile; maintainer CC'd. The tail end of the output follows; I can
provide a
Bryan W. Lepore wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:38:00 -0500
> From: Bryan W. Lepore
> To: c...@jiscmail.ac.uk
>
> [ mac osx 10.4 fink 0.29.9 ]
> [ reading WG Scott OSX wiki]
> [ coot 0.6-pre installs OK on 10.4 ]
>
> the fink checksum for
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:38:00 -0500
From: Bryan W. Lepore
To: c...@jiscmail.ac.uk
[ mac osx 10.4 fink 0.29.9 ]
[ reading WG Scott OSX wiki]
[ coot 0.6-pre installs OK on 10.4 ]
the fink checksum for coot fails. tried -b, no difference.
d
Sorry for the missing info...
it's Mac OS 10.4.11 with Xcode version 2.5
here is the result of the command :
pc242vl2:~ jflebrun$ xcodebuild -version
Component versions: DevToolsCore-798.0; DevToolsSupport-794.0
Sorry I don't know exactly where starts the error message. it seems
that the late
Hi,
I need a bit more info in your bug report.
Which version of MacOS X is this? 10.4.x / 10.5.x / 10.6.x
What version of xcode?
xcodebuild -version | head -n 1And you have cropped the error message so
that is starts just after the useful error message. There should be a libtool
command a
\
Jean-Frédéric Lebrun wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'am on Mac OS X.4.11 on intel iMac
>
> Will compiling gdal it fails with the following error (gdal-shlibs in
> fact)
>
> --
> /usr/libexec/gcc
Hi all
I'am on Mac OS X.4.11 on intel iMac
Will compiling gdal it fails with the following error (gdal-shlibs in
fact)
--
/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-apple-darwin8/4.0.1/libtool: internal lin
32 matches
Mail list logo
