On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 03:49:57AM +0200, Jean-Fran?ois Mertens wrote:
> When instaling gdb, I get:
>
> > # dpkg --force-overwrite -i /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-
> > darwin-i386/devel/gdb_7.1-1_darwin-i386.deb
> > (Reading database ... 768642 files and directories currently
> > install
On Apr 15, 2010, at 6:10 PM, Stan Sanderson wrote:
> David-
>
> Did I miss something or is the Gunmeric 1.10 update still problematic?
> The bugzilla.gnome (bug#614073) entries suggest a solution has not
> been found. I'm wary of attempting an update and having to revert again.
>
> (PPC 10.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:35:16PM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> On 04/16/2010 12:30 PM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
> >
> >
> > since conftest was just compiled, not linked, the "-T" operation may
> > not have been considered meaningful by objdump ?
> > Ie _ is it really an error ?
>
> Yes,
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:35:16PM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> On 04/16/2010 12:30 PM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
> >
> >
> > since conftest was just compiled, not linked, the "-T" operation may
> > not have been considered meaningful by objdump ?
> > Ie _ is it really an error ?
>
> Yes,
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:35:16PM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> On 04/16/2010 12:30 PM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
> >
> >
> > since conftest was just compiled, not linked, the "-T" operation may
> > not have been considered meaningful by objdump ?
> > Ie _ is it really an error ?
>
> Yes,
(resend, sorry if dup...having local mail problems)
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 03:49:57AM +0200, Jean-Fran?ois Mertens wrote:
> When instaling gdb, I get:
>
> > # dpkg --force-overwrite -i /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-
> > darwin-i386/devel/gdb_7.1-1_darwin-i386.deb
> > (Reading database ...
On 04/16/2010 12:30 PM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
>
>
> since conftest was just compiled, not linked, the "-T" operation may
> not have been considered meaningful by objdump ?
> Ie _ is it really an error ?
Yes, because it does not understand the load command (from
/usr/include/mach-o/loade
>>> /sw/bin/objdump: conftest: Invalid operation
>>>
>>> So binutils' objdump does not actually work?
>>
>
> It is doing
>
>
> echo "int main() {return 0;} int foobar() {return 0;}" > conftest.c
> gcc conftest.c -o conftest
> objdump -T conftest | grep foobar
Thanks!
So, from the manpage,
>
Robert E. Smith wrote:
[]
> [smith:~] res% fink-virtual-pkgs --debug 2>&1 | grep -A 19 xcode
> Ambiguous output redirect.
> [smith:~] res%
>
> Looks like there is a typo in the second one.
No, it is correct for sh type shells like bash (which is the default
now). For csh or tcsh, which you are u
On 04/16/2010 12:17 PM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
>
> On 16 Apr 2010, at 18:21, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>
>> On 04/16/2010 09:50 AM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
>>
>> checking for exported symbols... unable to read unknown load command
>> 0x1b
>> /sw/bin/objdump: conftest: Invalid o
On 16 Apr 2010, at 18:21, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> On 04/16/2010 09:50 AM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
>
> checking for exported symbols... unable to read unknown load
> command
> 0x1b
> /sw/bin/objdump: conftest: Invalid operation
> checking for -rdynamic... unable to read
On 04/16/2010 09:50 AM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
checking for exported symbols... unable to read unknown load command
0x1b
/sw/bin/objdump: conftest: Invalid operation
checking for -rdynamic... unable to read unknown load command 0x1b
/sw/bin/objdump: conftest: Invalid
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:21:52AM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> On 04/16/2010 09:50 AM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
>
> checking for exported symbols... unable to read unknown load command
> 0x1b
> /sw/bin/objdump: conftest: Invalid operation
> checking for -rdynamic... unab
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 04:50:34PM +0200, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
>
> On 16 Apr 2010, at 15:14, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
>> JF,
>> When you say you had to remove binutils to build gcc45, do you
>> mean that FSF gcc tries to use binutils instead of cctools if present?
>> If so, we definitely nee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/16/10 12:06 PM, Robert E. Smith wrote:
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> So I get the following results from those commands
>
> fink -V | head -n 2
> Package manager version: 0.27.13
> Distribution version: 0.9.0.cvs i386
> [smith:~] res% fink-virtual-
Hi Alexander,
So I get the following results from those commands
fink -V | head -n 2
Package manager version: 0.27.13
Distribution version: 0.9.0.cvs i386
[smith:~] res% fink-virtual-pkgs --debug 2>&1 | grep -A 19 xcode
Ambiguous output redirect.
[smith:~] res%
Looks like there is a typo in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/16/10 9:51 AM, Robert E. Smith wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I recently upgraded to snow leopard v10.6.3, I upgraded xcode to 3.2.2 and
> now I have upgraded to finkcommander 0.5.5 however when I try to
> install packages I get the following complaint.
>
Hi,
I recently upgraded to snow leopard v10.6.3, I upgraded xcode to 3.2.2 and
now I have upgraded to finkcommander 0.5.5 however when I try to
install packages I get the following complaint.
Can't resolve dependency "xcode (>= 3.1.2)" for package "gcc44-4.4.1-1000"
(no matching packages/version
On 16 Apr 2010, at 15:14, Jack Howarth wrote:
> JF,
> When you say you had to remove binutils to build gcc45, do you
> mean that FSF gcc tries to use binutils instead of cctools if present?
> If so, we definitely need either a BuildConflicts or to manually
> pass the --with-as, --with-ld, --wit
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 03:49:57AM +0200, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
> When instaling gdb, I get:
>
>> # dpkg --force-overwrite -i /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-
>> darwin-i386/devel/gdb_7.1-1_darwin-i386.deb
>> (Reading database ... 768642 files and directories currently
>> installed.)
When instaling gdb, I get:
> # dpkg --force-overwrite -i /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-
> darwin-i386/devel/gdb_7.1-1_darwin-i386.deb
> (Reading database ... 768642 files and directories currently
> installed.)
> Preparing to replace gdb 7.1-1 (using .../gdb_7.1-1_darwin-
> i386.deb) ...
21 matches
Mail list logo