Yes, if sedding info files sounds scary, then you should probably wait
(or use the bindist).
On Friday, 03 October 2014 at 18:06, Lowell Tacconi-Garman wrote:
> Sounds to me like I'm better off waiting a bit, right? Maybe coming back to
> things next week some time?
> >Oh boy. I really need to fi
Oh boy. I really need to fix this in the source packages. It is
possible to recover here, but it requires poking under the covers of
dpkg a bit. You'd want to find ghc-* in /sw/var/lib/dpkg/info and for
each of those files, comment out or delete the line "set -e". At that
point, recursive remove sh
There's a bug in the packaging. The ghc-mods need to depend on the
exact point release of the compiler that built them in order to remain
known to the ghc package system on upgrade.
In this case, you'd have to I think remove ghc-text, then rebuild it
so that it registered against current ghc.
On
Am 03.10.2014 um 03:01 schrieb Lowell Tacconi-Garman:
>> pandoc
>> The following 28 additional packages will be installed:
>> ghc-aeson ghc-attoparsec ghc-conduit ghc-digest ghc-exceptions
>> ghc-hashable
>> ghc-hslua ghc-lifted-base ghc-mmorph ghc-monad-control ghc-pandoc-types
>> ghc-primitive
