On Thursday, August 29, 2002, at 08:54 AM, Stefan Schulze wrote:
>
> Am Donnerstag, 29.08.02 um 17:02 Uhr schrieb Ben Hines:
>
>>>
>>> having a different version than the one provided by apple (see the
>>> -c problem
>>> with fink's man in 10.2/Jaguar).
>>>
>>
>> Er.. the -c problem is not with
Am Donnerstag, 29.08.02 um 17:02 Uhr schrieb Ben Hines:
>>
>> having a different version than the one provided by apple (see the -c
>> problem
>> with fink's man in 10.2/Jaguar).
>>
>
> Er.. the -c problem is not with fink's man. It is with apple's man.
> The FIX is to, in fact, use Fink's man
On Thursday, August 29, 2002, at 03:17 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> BTW: Why is it necessary to have tar, man, etc. as essential packages
> with
> fink? These programs are already on a OS X machine and I see no
> advantages in
> having a different version than the one provided by apple (se
Hello!
When doing a 'sudo fink selfupdate' i run i a problem because alpha.gnu.org
is not reachable an therefore no CVS access to tar Version 1.13.25-1.
And it seems to me that there isn't a mirror for downloading it.
Any suggestions?
BTW: Why is it necessary to have tar, man, etc. as essentia
