The cvs sources should build 0.5.3 unless i forgot to check something
in which is possible. Yes i never tagged 0.5.2, oh well.
IMO, providing CVS is enough. For open source principles, fine, but I
don't see why one would want to use the finkcommander source tgz to
install it. Anyway, I didn't r
Ben,
I know you are the only one who still works on FinkCommander, so I don't
want to annoy you more than necessary ;-) You know that I was the one
who always deplored the hostility with which the FinkCommander project
and sburrius himself were "welcomed" by certain Fink developers, and I
stil
I wholeheartedly agree with Martin. Ever since I began enjoying Fink,
I've always opted for source distribution but I sure do not want to
have to wrangle with CVS to get it. Heck, the day Fink came out with
rsync selfupdating was a happy day indeed ! If there were to be no
other option but CV
Why?
-Ben
On Apr 18, 2004, at 11:34 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Ben Hines wrote:
Version 0.5.3 of FinkCommander has been released. This version is a
bug-fix release, which fixes the bug added in 0.5.2 where all
packages showed as stable.
Hi Ben,
would it be too much to ask to put a source tarb
Ben Hines wrote:
Version 0.5.3 of FinkCommander has been released. This version is a
bug-fix release, which fixes the bug added in 0.5.2 where all packages
showed as stable.
Hi Ben,
would it be too much to ask to put a source tarball on the finkcommander
sourceforge site, as it used to be until
Version 0.5.3 of FinkCommander has been released. This version is a bug-fix release, which fixes the bug added in 0.5.2 where all packages showed as stable.
http://finkcommander.sourceforge.net/history/
FinkCommander is a graphical user interface for the Fink software packaging system for Mac OS
