I must have missed the discussion on this, but is fink "ready" for
Intel based machine? are the current binaries release universal
already? or everything relies on Rosetta?
Thanks,
--
Felix
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xP
On 3/9/06, Felix Ingrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I must have missed the discussion on this, but is fink "ready" for
> Intel based machine? are the current binaries release universal
> already? or everything relies on Rosetta?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Felix
>
>
Currently the Fink project pla
Excuse my potential misunderstanding, but does this mean there might be a
fink-intel and a separate fink-ppc release, or just that fink may have
more source trees (ppc vs. intel), as opposed to just those trees that are
differentiated by Mac OS X version(s) and stability?
Perhaps it simply mea
On 3/9/06, Matt Kozak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Excuse my potential misunderstanding, but does this mean there might be a
> fink-intel and a separate fink-ppc release, or just that fink may have
> more source trees (ppc vs. intel), as opposed to just those trees that are
> differentiated by Mac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 9, 2006, at 2:05 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On 3/9/06, Matt Kozak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Excuse my potential misunderstanding, but does this mean there
might be a
fink-intel and a separate fink-ppc release, or just that fink may
h
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
>On 3/9/06, Felix Ingrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>I must have missed the discussion on this, but is fink "ready" for
>>Intel based machine? are the current binaries release universal
>>already? or everything relies on Rosetta?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>--
>> Feli
