Re: kdenetwork doesn't compile Re: [Fink-users] KDE 3.1 RC5 available in Fink unstable

2003-01-03 Thread Benjamin Reed
On Friday, January 3, 2003, at 07:12 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: ksirc.cpp:23:19: cdate.h: No such file or directory make[3]: *** [ksirc.o] Error 1 This should be fixed now. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek hea

Re: [Fink-users] KDE 3.1 RC5 available in Fink unstable

2003-01-02 Thread Benjamin Reed
On Thursday, January 2, 2003, at 06:34 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Benjamin Reed wrote: [] Well, originally I had put those packages together assuming that they would be released before qt 3.1 packages got released. That would have made it all OK, because at the time, for compatibility purposes

Re: [Fink-users] KDE 3.1 RC5 available in Fink unstable

2003-01-02 Thread Benjamin Reed
On Thursday, January 2, 2003, at 10:49 PM, Ben Hines wrote: On Thursday, January 2, 2003, at 03:23 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: work. Then it was pointed out that you're not supposed to depend on -dev packages so I removed it (which in this case, I don't agree with, but what the hey). =) You

Re: [Fink-users] KDE 3.1 RC5 available in Fink unstable

2003-01-02 Thread Ben Hines
On Thursday, January 2, 2003, at 03:23 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: work. Then it was pointed out that you're not supposed to depend on -dev packages so I removed it (which in this case, I don't agree with, but what the hey). =) You don't agree with the ability to have multiple versions of lib

Re: [Fink-users] KDE 3.1 RC5 available in Fink unstable

2003-01-02 Thread David R. Morrison
On Jan 2,2003 18:23:19 -0500, Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : >On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 18:17, Martin Costabel wrote: > >> The fact that all qt3 splitoffs are "BuildDependsOnly: true" is probably >> only a copy-n-pasto. > >Yeah. I'll have to clean that up. > >> What gives me trouble is t

Re: [Fink-users] KDE 3.1 RC5 available in Fink unstable

2003-01-02 Thread Martin Costabel
Benjamin Reed wrote: [] Well, originally I had put those packages together assuming that they would be released before qt 3.1 packages got released. That would have made it all OK, because at the time, for compatibility purposes, qt3 depended on qt3-dev in the new packages, so it would have conti

Re: [Fink-users] KDE 3.1 RC5 available in Fink unstable

2003-01-02 Thread Benjamin Reed
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 18:17, Martin Costabel wrote: > The fact that all qt3 splitoffs are "BuildDependsOnly: true" is probably > only a copy-n-pasto. Yeah. I'll have to clean that up. > What gives me trouble is that the headers that were in qt3 previously > are in qt3-dev now. This means that

Re: [Fink-users] KDE 3.1 RC5 available in Fink unstable

2003-01-02 Thread Martin Costabel
Benjamin Reed wrote: - KDE-related Software Updates: The following non-core KDE packages have been added/updated: kdbg: version 1.2.6 kdevelop: 3.0 alpha2 koffice: 1.2.1 mosfet-liquid: 0.9.6pre1 qt3: 3.1 While I can't comment on the new kde yet (maybe in 2 or 3 days when it will

[Fink-users] KDE 3.1 RC5 available in Fink unstable

2003-01-02 Thread Benjamin Reed
(part of my new year's resolution is to be a bit more proactive in saying what's going on in kde-darwin development =) KDE 3.1 RC5 is in Fink unstable as of a few minutes ago. Please give it a shot, and let me know if you have any issues. I'm pretty confident all the major issues are worked out,