debianutils and sensible-utils should no longer be essential, they aren't
needed for bootstrapping and nothing needs them really, they are utils to help
that is all.
also po4a has been long since removed, sorry, I know it's short but everything
I time is not coming across properly.
---
TS
http:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:15:18 -0400, Hanspeter Niederstrasser
wrote:
>
> This is the dependency chain:
>
> debianutils BD-> po4a -> BD-> docbook-utils D-> jadetex, which is
> provided by texlive.
>
> po4a is the real culprit here. It's dependency list is just too heavy.
TheSin, looking throug
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:13 AM, TheSin wrote:
> po4a has been removed, since I only speak en this doesn't affect me at all,
> po4a = po 4 all, aka it's an i18n man/locale translator, so now both
> debianutils and sensible-utils will install international man pages but I
> believe they won't b
po4a has been removed, since I only speak en this doesn't affect me at all,
po4a = po 4 all, aka it's an i18n man/locale translator, so now both
debianutils and sensible-utils will install international man pages but I
believe they won't be translated. Not a huge deal to make people happy I
su
I agree that it does not need to be essential at all, but that being said new
versions of dpkg in the future will require tex for install-info since its
being deprecated for ginstall-info upstream so maybe we need to look at debs of
debs? I'll re-work debianutils today and split it up I should
On 6/28/2012 11:51 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 6/28/12 8:44 PM, Bill Waggoner wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Alexander Hansen
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Sure. We're in the process of updating our Debian-based toolset. The
>>> "debiantools" package got updated, and it has a much large
On 28/06/12 21:51, Alexander Hansen wrote:
[]
> I'm not sure what's pulling texlive in. I'm not happy about that. ;-)
I think thesin has somewhat gone overboard with this new debianutils
package. It's an essential package, for god's sake! It simply cannot
depend on all the stuff it now depends
On 6/28/12 8:44 PM, Bill Waggoner wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Alexander Hansen
>> wrote:
>>
>> Sure. We're in the process of updating our Debian-based toolset. The
>> "debiantools" package got updated, and it has a much larger dependency
>> tree than it used to.
>>
>> --
>> Alex
>On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Alexander Hansen
> wrote:
>
> Sure. We're in the process of updating our Debian-based toolset. The
> "debiantools" package got updated, and it has a much larger dependency
> tree than it used to.
>
> --
> Alexander Hansen, Ph.D.
> Fink User Liaison
> My package
On 6/28/12 8:11 PM, Bill Waggoner wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Alexander Hansen
> wrote:
>> On 6/28/12 7:06 PM, Bill Waggoner wrote:
>>> I ran a "normal" fink selfupdate tonight and got a very large list of
>>> updates to be done. I declined the update so I could run selfupdate
>>>
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Alexander Hansen
wrote:
> On 6/28/12 7:06 PM, Bill Waggoner wrote:
>> I ran a "normal" fink selfupdate tonight and got a very large list of
>> updates to be done. I declined the update so I could run selfupdate
>> with logging turned on. Apparently selfupdate do
On 6/28/12 7:06 PM, Bill Waggoner wrote:
> I ran a "normal" fink selfupdate tonight and got a very large list of
> updates to be done. I declined the update so I could run selfupdate
> with logging turned on. Apparently selfupdate doesn't log ... details
> to follow.
>
> Here is the selfupdate w
I ran a "normal" fink selfupdate tonight and got a very large list of
updates to be done. I declined the update so I could run selfupdate
with logging turned on. Apparently selfupdate doesn't log ... details
to follow.
Here is the selfupdate with logging requested:
% fink --log-output selfupdat
13 matches
Mail list logo
