I believe that's the only circumstance when the revision number won't
change.
On Friday, October 24, 2003, at 10:56 AM, Viv Kendon wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Alexander Hansen wrote:
**
This has supposedly been fixed (worked
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Alexander Hansen wrote:
**
> This has supposedly been fixed (worked for me), without changing the
> version number (since it didn't build in the first place). Do another
sneaky! I didn't
Christopher Bowns wrote:
After a lengthy search of the fink-users archives, it seems this problem
has gone totally unanswered.
This is a lie. There have been answers, and the package description has
been corrected twice as a consequence of these discussions.
If you want to help find out why so
On Thursday, Oct 23, 2003, at 03:21 Europe/Brussels, Christopher Bowns
wrote:
After a lengthy search of the fink-users archives, it seems this
problem has gone totally unanswered. I can't compile netpbm-10.18-2;
it dies in the make install phase, due to some funkiness in the man
directory path
This has supposedly been fixed (worked for me), without changing the
version number (since it didn't build in the first place). Do another
selfupdate.
On Wednesday, October 22, 2003, at 09:21 PM, Christopher Bowns wrote:
After a lengthy search of the fink-users archives, it seems this
problem
After a lengthy search of the fink-users archives, it seems this
problem has gone totally unanswered. I can't compile netpbm-10.18-2; it
dies in the make install phase, due to some funkiness in the man
directory paths. I've contacted the package manager about this, but I
haven't heard back from
