Am 22.01.2012 um 21:49 schrieb Hanspeter Niederstrasser:
>
> More informative in this case would have been your xcode version since that
> affects the compiler. I'm guessing it's xcode4.2, which no longer has
> gcc-4.2 (qtwebkit's default compiler). I've committed your patch now to 10.7
> a
On 1/22/2012 6:39 AM, Pierre Schnizer wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> fink stable failed to build on Mac OS X Lion 10.7.2. But the solution
> can already be found
> on https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39945 with the modification
> visible in
> https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=57442&a
Dear all,
fink stable failed to build on Mac OS X Lion 10.7.2. But the solution
can already be found
on https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39945 with the modification visible
in
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=57442&action=prettypatch
So I added the following lines to
Fink-specific patch attached that does the same as the Macports fix here:
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/24947
https://trac.macports.org/attachment/ticket/24947/kdebase4-runtime-build-with-attica-0.1.4.diff
kdebase4-runtime-mac builds if you do:
# patch -p0 < attica-0.1.4-1.patch
first.
Chr
Martin, many thanks!!
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Either run "fink rebuild make". This will have the effect that afterwards the
> .deb file in question will exist, so that fink can freely remove and
> reinstall it;
Did not work for me, the result of executing `fink update' af
Mihaela Sighireanu wrote:
[]
> Param�trage de db44-aes (4.4.20-1004) ...
> The following packages must be temporarily removed, but there are no .debs to
> restore them from:
> make
> Exiting with failure.
Yes, this is a (IMHO somewhat annoying) feature where Fink tries to be
overly protective.
Dear Martin,
>
> This version should not (try to) use the patch file. I corrected this on CVS.
> Please allow an hour or so until this propagates to the rsync mirrors, then
> selfupdate again.
>
Thank you very much, Aquaterm is now installed !!!
... but I fell into another problem with update-
Mihaela Sighireanu wrote:
[]
> Param�trage de fink-buildlock-aquaterm-1.0.1-3 (2009.03.25-21.14.27) ...
> gzip -dc /sw/src/aquaterm_src.1.0.1.tar.gz | /sw/bin/tar -xf -
> --no-same-owner --no-same-permissions
> [ -r /sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/graphics/aquaterm.patch ]
> patch -p1 < /sw/fi
Hi,
I'm trying to update my packages with fink (already selfupdated) on a mac
-
Arch: intel
Syst: Mac OS X 10.5.6 (9G55)
Xcode: DevToolsCore-921.0; DevToolsSupport-893.0
SDK:
p system-sdk-10.4 [virtual package]
i system-sdk-10.4-universal 10.4-1 [virtual package
repre
fwiw, this does work for me on leopard/intel (NB: there should be no
spaces or line breaks in the pasted text). --rtw
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> Gernot Weber wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> sould someone of the fink developers please add this line
>>
> You're much better served sending a message to fink-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gernot Weber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sould someone of the fink developers please add this line
>
You're much better served sending a message to fink-devel, since more
developers read that list.
> SetLDFLAGS: -Wl,-dylib_file,/System/Library/Frameworks/
> OpenG
Hi,
sould someone of the fink developers please add this line
SetLDFLAGS: -Wl,-dylib_file,/System/Library/Frameworks/
OpenGL.framework/Versions/A/Libraries/libGL.dylib:/System/Library/
Frameworks/OpenGL.framework/Versions/A/Libraries/libGL.dylib
to djvulibre.info as line 15. Otherwise the pack
There have been some prior posts about problems with HFS+-aware rsync
(aka rsyncX). I had some problems on one of my boxes just a few
minutes ago, and installed the Fink rsync package, which seems not to
be as quirky.
The rsync maintainer mentioned at one point on one of the lists that
HF
Erik Osheim wrote:
Has anyone else noticed problems like this? I am currently having trouble
compiling imlib2-- imlib2.patch was one of those files that rsync
complained about. After touching the patch, I don't get a warning from
selfupdate, and it claims to patch properly during the build, but th
On 06 Nov 2003, at 09:34, Benjamin Reed wrote:
Erik Osheim wrote:
Has anyone else noticed problems like this? I am currently having
trouble
compiling imlib2-- imlib2.patch was one of those files that rsync
complained about. After touching the patch, I don't get a warning from
selfupdate, and it
Recently I noticed that I was getting warnings from selfupdate. I have
switched over to the rsync method, and these problems seem specific to it.
In particular, certain .patch and .info files do not exist and cause the
rsync to experience errors. Here is a sample excerpt from fink selfupdate:
Hi,
I started the 10.2-gcc3.3 update-all loose and made it as far as
qt-x11-free before running into a .patch file problem. I trust the
maintainer would like to know about this.
Evan
qt-x11-free-3.2.1/plugins/src/styles/windows/windows.pro
qt-x11-free-3.2.1/plugins/src/styles/styles.pro
qt-x11
If you want to compile libdv-0.98 from source on fink 0.4.1 / OS 10.1.5,
you run across a two problems while compiling: one is due to a compact
notation for constant arrays used in the source, e.g.:
/bin/sh ../libtool --silent --mode=compile cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.
-I.. -g -O2 -Wall -g -c
I had a patch hang (much pain) while doing a fink update-all, I
was running the active Norton Antivirus at the time. Everything
worked fine when I tried again after recovering, with it turned off.
It would be good if the instructions advised turning it off. Otherwise,
in 10.2.1, I am happy to hav
> Yes, I thought that. But when I tried the first time it took the wrong
> patch and crashed again ... I installed the new patch and then ran fink
> in a new terminal window, so I thought it should take the
> /sw/bin/patch,
> but apparently not. But maybe I made a mistake somewhere.
>
> Vincent.
> Great ! It works also for me ! Thanks a lot !
>
> Just one point: apt-get install patch places a new patch in /sw/bin.
> Think to remove the one in /usr/bin.
Removing the one in /usr/bin isn't necessary as long as /sw/bin is in
your path BEFORE /usr/bin (which it is, by default). It MIGHT be
hanks.
Jeff
> --
> From: Ken Engel
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 4:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Fink-users] Patch
>
> -rwxr-xr-x1 root wheel 97948 Jan 14 23:30 /usr/bin/patch*
>
> I have the same. But I have nev
, but you might
want to try using the
fink-installed patch.
regards,
Ken Engel
> Message: 2
> From: "Hester, Jeffrey W." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 08:06:23 -050
On Thursday, June 13, 2002, at 09:06 AM, Hester, Jeffrey W. wrote:
> [localhost:~] hester% which patch
> /usr/bin/patch
> [localhost:~] hester% ls -l /usr/bin/patch
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 97948 Dec 26 08:27 /usr/bin/patch
> [localhost:~] hester%
% which patch
/usr/bin/patch
% ls
Hello all,
Can someone verify their "patch" for me? Here's mine:
[localhost:~] hester% which patch
/usr/bin/patch
[localhost:~] hester% ls -l /usr/bin/patch
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 97948 Dec 26 08:27 /usr/bin/patch
[localhost:~] hester%
For some reason some packages being installed
25 matches
Mail list logo
