[Fink-users] Re: gcc4 on 10.3.9

2006-01-25 Thread Robert T Wyatt
Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On 1/12/06, Robert T Wyatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well I built and installed it now so that's good from a fink perspective, but it hasn't helped me figure out why I get those spurious errors. I'm sure the root of those will turn up sooner or later They could

[Fink-users] Re: gcc4 on 10.3.9

2006-01-12 Thread Robert T Wyatt
Well I built and installed it now so that's good from a fink perspective, but it hasn't helped me figure out why I get those spurious errors. I'm sure the root of those will turn up sooner or later --- This SF.net email is sponsored by:

Re: [Fink-users] Re: gcc4 on 10.3.9

2006-01-12 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 1/12/06, Robert T Wyatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well I built and installed it now so that's good from a fink perspective, but it hasn't helped me figure out why I get those spurious errors. I'm sure the root of those will turn up sooner or later They could be due to something as

[Fink-users] Re: gcc4 on 10.3.9

2006-01-12 Thread Robert T Wyatt
Alexander K. Hansen wrote: They could be due to something as simple as a flaky RAM module. That's an idea! I'll check out the hardware since my LAN administrator may well have stuck something in this machine --- This SF.net email is