Re: [Fink-users] cvs vs. rsync

2003-10-12 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > It appears (at least it did for me) that you can freely switch back and > forth, with the caveat that if you try reverting to CVS, you may wind up not > being able to update because of server problems (same old, same old). > Hi Alexander, Yes, you can switch between r

Re: [Fink-users] cvs vs. rsync

2003-10-11 Thread Brian Morton
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bart Silverstrim Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 1:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Fink-users] cvs vs. rsync I've seen the talk of the (experimental?) feature for updating using rsync Is this a feature that can be freely switched back a

RE: [Fink-users] cvs vs. rsync

2003-10-11 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
/LDX   -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bart Silverstrim Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 1:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Fink-users] cvs vs. rsync I've seen the talk of the (experimental?) feature for updating using rsync Is

Re: [Fink-users] cvs vs. rsync

2003-10-11 Thread John Blumer
Hi Bart, No don't feel like the Lone Ranger, since my installation, I've never been able to run the first update. I'll leave your other ?'s for others. John On Saturday, Oct 11, 2003, at 12:45 America/Chicago, Bart Silverstrim wrote: This is the third day where all I've gotten are connection erro

[Fink-users] cvs vs. rsync

2003-10-11 Thread Bart Silverstrim
I've seen the talk of the (experimental?) feature for updating using rsync Is this a feature that can be freely switched back and forth, using selfupdate-cvs and selfupdate-rsync, or are there more settings that would need to be changed to do so? Would there be risk of screwing up fink by