On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 7:09 PM, David Fang wrote:
> Charles,
>
> I asked around in #guile (irc.freenode.net), and someone says there are
> known incompatibilities between 1.8 and 2.0. Do you know if upstream
> (gschem) has already migrated to 2.0 and tested?
There was one conversation where Pet
Charles,
I asked around in #guile (irc.freenode.net), and someone says there are
known incompatibilities between 1.8 and 2.0. Do you know if upstream
(gschem) has already migrated to 2.0 and tested?
Developers in #guile are usually responsive, when they're awake, so stop
in. :)
Fang
On Mon,
On Jul 21, 2014, at 1:46 PM, David Fang wrote:
> Charles,
> Is that an error during *building* guile20, or during use of guile20 in
> your package? I unfortunately don't have 10.9 for testing, but I can ask
> someone in #fink to test on 10.9 (and I thought I had before).
I should have be
Charles,
Is that an error during *building* guile20, or during use of
guile20 in your package? I unfortunately don't have 10.9 for testing, but
I can ask someone in #fink to test on 10.9 (and I thought I had before).
Is vm.c already de-optimized in your guile20.info?
Fang
> On Jul 8, 2
On Jul 8, 2014, at 7:25 AM, Charles Lepple wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2014, at 9:10 PM, David Fang wrote:
>
>> Charles,
>>
>> Can geda (and friends) use guile20 yet?
>
> Theoretically, yes. If I just replace guile18* with guile20 in the Fink info
> file, there is a strange error at runtime - we can
On Jul 7, 2014, at 9:10 PM, David Fang wrote:
> Charles,
>
> Can geda (and friends) use guile20 yet?
Theoretically, yes. If I just replace guile18* with guile20 in the Fink info
file, there is a strange error at runtime - we can take a look at that if you
would like.
> Fang
>
>> On 8/07/14
Charles,
Can geda (and friends) use guile20 yet?
Fang
> On 8/07/14 00:10, David Fang wrote:
>> Martin, and all,
>> Are there multiple places that need the CR fix? If this is an
>> isolated case, I could just apply that patch as a workaround.
>
> In the sources of geda-gaf, this seems the
On 8/07/14 00:10, David Fang wrote:
> Martin, and all,
> Are there multiple places that need the CR fix? If this is an
> isolated case, I could just apply that patch as a workaround.
In the sources of geda-gaf, this seems the only place that needs fixing.
With the patch to scheme_object.c,
Martin, and all,
Are there multiple places that need the CR fix? If this is an
isolated case, I could just apply that patch as a workaround.
Fang
> On 6/07/14 01:21, Charles Lepple wrote:
>> On Jul 5, 2014, at 6:39 PM, Kevin Horton []
>> > In file included from scheme_object.c:2175:
On 6/07/14 01:21, Charles Lepple wrote:
> On Jul 5, 2014, at 6:39 PM, Kevin Horton > In file included from scheme_object.c:2175:
>> ./scheme_object.x:80:84: error: expected ')'
>> scm_c_define_gsubr (s_translate_object_x, 3, 0, 0, (SCM (*)())
>> translate_object_x); ;
>>
>> ^
>> ./sch
On Jul 5, 2014, at 6:39 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
> On July 5, 2014 at 11:10:00 AM, Charles Lepple (clep...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> On Jul 1, 2014, at 8:32 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
>>
>> > I note that gschem throws an error on launch, complaining that it cannot
>> > find ice-9/boot-9.scm. Installin
11 matches
Mail list logo
