Re: [Fink-users] lablgl-x11-1.04-1 build failure on 10.9

2013-12-18 Thread Viv Kendon
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > >> "Between 2.6.0-2 and 2.6.0-3 it was necessary to change >> one of the dependancies of this package from labl to >> lablgl-x11." >> >> I don't know how to format an alternative Depends entry, but >> I think it should be OK for lablgtk2 to d

Re: [Fink-users] lablgl-x11-1.04-1 build failure on 10.9

2013-12-18 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
> "Between 2.6.0-2 and 2.6.0-3 it was necessary to change > one of the dependancies of this package from labl to > lablgl-x11." > > I don't know how to format an alternative Depends entry, but > I think it should be OK for lablgtk2 to depend on either > lablgl or labgl-x11. Alternative Depends us

Re: [Fink-users] lablgl-x11-1.04-1 build failure on 10.9

2013-12-18 Thread Viv Kendon
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > On 12/17/2013 3:21 AM, Viv Kendon wrote: >> On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: >> >>> On 12/16/2013 4:55 PM, Viv Kendon wrote: Apologies if this has already been reported. Doesn't seem to be a maintainer to Cc, no

Re: [Fink-users] lablgl-x11-1.04-1 build failure on 10.9

2013-12-17 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
On 12/17/2013 3:21 AM, Viv Kendon wrote: > On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > >> On 12/16/2013 4:55 PM, Viv Kendon wrote: >>> Apologies if this has already been reported. Doesn't seem >>> to be a maintainer to Cc, not Cc'ing fink-devel as I'm not >>> subscribed. >>> >>> cd Togl

Re: [Fink-users] lablgl-x11-1.04-1 build failure on 10.9

2013-12-17 Thread Viv Kendon
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > On 12/16/2013 4:55 PM, Viv Kendon wrote: >> Apologies if this has already been reported. Doesn't seem >> to be a maintainer to Cc, not Cc'ing fink-devel as I'm not >> subscribed. >> >> cd Togl && make togl.o CC="ocamlc.opt -verbose" CFLAGS='

Re: [Fink-users] lablgl-x11-1.04-1 build failure on 10.9

2013-12-16 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
On 12/16/2013 4:55 PM, Viv Kendon wrote: Apologies if this has already been reported. Doesn't seem to be a maintainer to Cc, not Cc'ing fink-devel as I'm not subscribed. cd Togl && make togl.o CC="ocamlc.opt -verbose" CFLAGS='-c -ccopt "-c -O -I../../src -ITogl -I/sw/include -I. -I/usr/X11R6/in

Re: [Fink-users] lablgl-x11-1.04-1 build failure on 10.9

2013-12-16 Thread Viv Kendon
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 12/16/13 3:47 PM, Viv Kendon wrote: >> On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: >> >>> On 12/16/2013 4:55 PM, Viv Kendon wrote: Apologies if this has already been reported. Doesn't seem to be a maintainer to Cc, not Cc'ing f

Re: [Fink-users] lablgl-x11-1.04-1 build failure on 10.9

2013-12-16 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 12/16/13 3:47 PM, Viv Kendon wrote: > On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > >> On 12/16/2013 4:55 PM, Viv Kendon wrote: >>> Apologies if this has already been reported. Doesn't seem >>> to be a maintainer to Cc, not Cc'ing fink-devel as I'm not >>> subscribed. >>> >>> cd Togl &

Re: [Fink-users] lablgl-x11-1.04-1 build failure on 10.9

2013-12-16 Thread Viv Kendon
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: On 12/16/2013 4:55 PM, Viv Kendon wrote: Apologies if this has already been reported. Doesn't seem to be a maintainer to Cc, not Cc'ing fink-devel as I'm not subscribed. cd Togl && make togl.o CC="ocamlc.opt -verbose" CFLAGS='-c -ccopt "-c

Re: [Fink-users] lablgl-x11-1.04-1 build failure on 10.9

2013-12-16 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
On 12/16/2013 4:55 PM, Viv Kendon wrote: > Apologies if this has already been reported. Doesn't seem > to be a maintainer to Cc, not Cc'ing fink-devel as I'm not > subscribed. > > cd Togl && make togl.o CC="ocamlc.opt -verbose" CFLAGS='-c > -ccopt "-c -O -I../../src -ITogl -I/sw/include -I. > -I/u

[Fink-users] lablgl-x11-1.04-1 build failure on 10.9

2013-12-16 Thread Viv Kendon
Apologies if this has already been reported. Doesn't seem to be a maintainer to Cc, not Cc'ing fink-devel as I'm not subscribed. cd Togl && make togl.o CC="ocamlc.opt -verbose" CFLAGS='-c -ccopt "-c -O -I../../src -ITogl -I/sw/include -I. -I/usr/X11R6/include "' make[2]: Entering directory `

Re: [Fink-users] lablgl-x11

2007-12-01 Thread Brendan Cully
Thanks Martin. I've made this change in ocaml-3.10.0-1001. On 26-Nov-07, at 4:00 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: > David Phillips wrote: >> On Nov 26, 2007, at 5:20 PM, LiKai Liu wrote: >>> Did you install the X11 SDK? What does the command 'locate >>> Xlib.h' say? > > The reason why this doesn't w

Re: [Fink-users] lablgl-x11

2007-11-26 Thread Martin Costabel
David Phillips wrote: > On Nov 26, 2007, at 5:20 PM, LiKai Liu wrote: > >> Did you install the X11 SDK? What does the command 'locate Xlib.h' >> say? The reason why this doesn't work on Leopard is that ocaml's configure looks for a couple of libX11 libraries, namely here if test -f $dir/li

Re: [Fink-users] lablgl-x11

2007-11-26 Thread David Phillips
On Nov 26, 2007, at 5:20 PM, LiKai Liu wrote: > Did you install the X11 SDK? What does the command 'locate Xlib.h' > say? locate Xlib.h: /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk/System/Library/Frameworks/Tk.framework/ Versions/8.4/Headers/X11/Xlib.h /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk/usr/ X11R6/include/

Re: [Fink-users] lablgl-x11

2007-11-26 Thread Alexander Hansen
David Phillips wrote: > On Nov 26, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > > >> I'm guessing that labltk (which is part of ocaml) wasn't >> built. >> >> That probably indicates a build issue with ocaml that didn't stop the >> package from being generated. Can you

Re: [Fink-users] lablgl-x11

2007-11-26 Thread David Phillips
On Nov 26, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > I'm guessing that labltk (which is part of ocaml) wasn't > built. >> > That probably indicates a build issue with ocaml that didn't stop the > package from being generated. Can you do a "fink -l rebuild ocaml" The full log is at:

Re: [Fink-users] lablgl-x11

2007-11-26 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Phillips wrote: > On Nov 26, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > >>> On Nov 26, 2007, at 12:30 PM, LiKai Liu wrote: >>> I'm guessing that labltk (which is part of ocaml) wasn't built. Can you run the command "labltk"? That c

Re: [Fink-users] lablgl-x11

2007-11-26 Thread David Phillips
On Nov 26, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: >> On Nov 26, 2007, at 12:30 PM, LiKai Liu wrote: >> >>> I'm guessing that labltk (which is part of ocaml) wasn't built. Can >>> you >>> run the command "labltk"? That command gives you a ocaml toplevel >>> with Tk >>> bindings. "Widget" is

Re: [Fink-users] lablgl-x11

2007-11-26 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Phillips wrote: > On Nov 26, 2007, at 12:30 PM, LiKai Liu wrote: > >> I'm guessing that labltk (which is part of ocaml) wasn't built. Can >> you >> run the command "labltk"? That command gives you a ocaml toplevel >> with Tk >> bindings. "Widge

Re: [Fink-users] lablgl-x11

2007-11-26 Thread David Phillips
On Nov 26, 2007, at 12:30 PM, LiKai Liu wrote: > I'm guessing that labltk (which is part of ocaml) wasn't built. Can > you > run the command "labltk"? That command gives you a ocaml toplevel > with Tk > bindings. "Widget" is one of the labltk modules. I don't see labltk listed as an availabl

[Fink-users] lablgl-x11

2007-11-26 Thread David Phillips
Hi, I've got a new macbook with 10.5.1 installed into which I'm trying to build all the packages I have running relatively smoothly on a desktop machine that smoothly upgraded from 10.4 to 10.5. In attempting to install unison, the process failed on lablgl-x11 with the error message below. I'