monipol schrieb:
> (...)
>
> Hello, Moritz. I've committed a new version of libical that should fix
> this problem. Could you please test it and tell us if it works for you?
>
Hi,
it worked! Thanks for the support.
Regards,
Moritz
-
On 22/11/2009, at 11:35, Moritz Kaiser wrote:
> Configuration:
> Mac OS 10.4.11
> Fink, unstable tree activated.
>
> Build says:
(...)
> gcc -Os -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -o .libs/doesnothing access_components.o
> access_properties_and_parameters.o errors.o main.o parse_text.o
> -L/sw/lib ../src/libical/.
On 22/11/2009, at 19:05, Martin Costabel wrote:
> monipol wrote:
>> Thanks for the report, Moritz. I've notified libical's maintainer
>> and he's working on a fix.
>
> Just for information: For me, it built without problems, both on
> 10.4 and 10.6. The symbol in question is indeed undefined (
monipol wrote:
> Thanks for the report, Moritz. I've notified libical's maintainer and
> he's working on a fix.
Just for information: For me, it built without problems, both on 10.4
and 10.6. The symbol in question is indeed undefined (which looks like a
bug in the libical code), but the compi
Thanks for the report, Moritz. I've notified libical's maintainer and
he's working on a fix.
-- monipol
On 22/11/2009, at 11:35, Moritz Kaiser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my update-all fails.
>
> Configuration:
> Mac OS 10.4.11
> Fink, unstable tree activated.
>
> Build says:
>
> -8<--
Hi,
my update-all fails.
Configuration:
Mac OS 10.4.11
Fink, unstable tree activated.
Build says:
-8<---*snip*
(cd .libs && rm -f libicalvcal.la && ln -s ../libicalvcal.la libicalvcal.la)
Making all in test
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[3]: Noth
