Re: [Fink-users] rsync and cvs paranoia

2009-12-29 Thread Viv Kendon
I'm certainly familiar with the problem, in the end I set up my own rsync server to redistribute inside our firewall (on a machine with access through it). It is possible to specify a port for rsync as part of the URL, so if someone could run an rsync server on port 80 or 443, that may work f

Re: [Fink-users] rsync and cvs paranoia

2009-12-29 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 There has been ongoing work with a mechanism by which Fink can be updated via HTTP directly, via a tarball snapshot of the package descriptions. I'm not sure if it's ready for testing yet. An option (clunky) is to download package descriptions (.info

Re: [Fink-users] rsync and cvs paranoia

2009-12-28 Thread Ian Schorr
I asked the same a few months ago - at the time there didn't seem to be a way. Most people seemed puzzled about the problem, let alone a viable solution (only things really offered were setting up SSL tunnels to bypass the firewall/content filter causing your problem). On 29/12/2009, at 5:52

[Fink-users] rsync and cvs paranoia

2009-12-28 Thread Felix Frolow
Is there a mechanism of convenient software installation and upgrade like fink which is bypass rsync or cvs for people who work in the places where paranoia rules I have to help someone in the other institution Dr Felix Frolow Professor of Structural Biology and Biotechnology Department of Mole