On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Benny Malengier
wrote:
> You should read up on domain decomposition methods (
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_decomposition_methods ).
> Specifically: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwarz_alternating_method
>
> So creating two models, each with their own mesh
2013/3/25 Kristopher Kuhlman
> Hello FiPy list,
>
> I am interested in solving a problem that involves two or more
> overlapping/connected domains. The same governing equations apply to each
> domain, but the properties are different and I am not sure the best way to
> include geometrical effect
Jason,
FYI, the changes have been committed back to the "develop" branch. See
http://matforge.org/fipy/ticket/564 and
http://matforge.org/fipy/changeset/5b1957aad/fipy.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Jason Furtney wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> Thanks for the reply and go ahead and make the changes.
Hello FiPy list,
I am interested in solving a problem that involves two or more
overlapping/connected domains. The same governing equations apply to each
domain, but the properties are different and I am not sure the best way to
include geometrical effects.
In the simplest case, the primary doma
On Mar 25, 2013, at 9:32 AM, Jonathan Guyer wrote:
>
> On Mar 23, 2013, at 6:00 PM, Serbulent UNSAL wrote:
>
>>> Much more expediently done with
>>>
>>> return tmp.flatten()
>>>
>>
>> No itertools.chain is clearly fastest method. It can be seen on
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4061
On Mar 23, 2013, at 6:00 PM, Serbulent UNSAL wrote:
>> Much more expediently done with
>>
>>return tmp.flatten()
>>
>
> No itertools.chain is clearly fastest method. It can be seen on
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/406121/flattening-a-shallow-list-in-python
But that post is about fi
