Hello again,
I am trying to solve the diffusion example in a circle with an annular region
instead. I thought this would be a straightforward extension and I’m sure it
is, I am just missing something. The reason I think something is wrong is
because the solutions are looking like this, after im
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 2:32 PM, L.Bryce Whitson Jr.
wrote:
> What would be the ill effects of putting a hook in the code that would
> make the boundary values correct? It would be a simple extrapolation using
> half the cell width and the gradient in the cell.
>
I don't think it would be a huge
What would be the ill effects of putting a hook in the code that would make
the boundary values correct? It would be a simple extrapolation using half
the cell width and the gradient in the cell.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L.Bryce Whitson Jr.
lwhits...@gmail.com
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:0
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:44 PM, L.Bryce Whitson Jr.
wrote:
> I recently noticed that the faceValue of a variable is incorrect when a
> Neumann (constant gradient) boundary condition is applied. For example,
> let's assume the following:
>
> dx = 1
> nx = 5
> dTr/dx = 4 for right face
> Tl = 300
I recently noticed that the faceValue of a variable is incorrect when a
Neumann (constant gradient) boundary condition is applied. For example,
let's assume the following:
dx = 1
nx = 5
dTr/dx = 4 for right face
Tl = 300 for left face
x = [0.5, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5]
The steady solution to this pro
