Hi Jon,
Thank you. It works perfectly.
Best,
Zhekai
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Guyer, Jonathan E. Dr. (Fed) <
jonathan.gu...@nist.gov> wrote:
> Zhekai -
>
> Thank you for the explanation. You're right, I answered a much simpler
> question than you were asking.
>
> The following should d
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Sergio Manzetti
wrote:
>
> Dear Daniel, I am wondering if you can clarify a small. thing.
>
> In the given script, phi is set as e^ix, and the numerical simulation treats
> the given PDE. Is phi tested for wether it is a result of the given PDE in
> this script ?