Behalf Of Daniel
Wheeler
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 3:17 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Re: Possibility of setting NaN constraints for CellVariable ?
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Guyer, Jonathan E. Dr. (Fed)
wrote:
> You can't do this. NaNs immediately propagate
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Guyer, Jonathan E. Dr. (Fed)
wrote:
> You can't do this. NaNs immediately propagate and will break your whole
> solution.
>
> If I had to do this, I would decouple this region from the other equations by
> zeroing out the coefficients of those other equations in
You can't do this. NaNs immediately propagate and will break your whole
solution.
If I had to do this, I would decouple this region from the other equations by
zeroing out the coefficients of those other equations in the appropriate region.
> On Jul 13, 2016, at 8:49 AM, Gopalakrishnan, Krishna
Hi, Krishna.
This strikes me as a strange way to go about implementing something, so it
might be helpful to have a bit more physical details about the system in
order to see if the list has proposals for alternative ways to address the
problem. The worry about 0's propagating into the rest of the
Hello,
I have a regular 2D Cartesian uniformly spaced mesh.
Due to some peculiarities of the physical system that I am currently working
with, the variable of interest in one of my PDEs, (fiPy CellVariable), is
undefined in certain interior node locations, i.e. we need to constrain them to
a
