Re: Dynamic under-relaxation factors for FiPy sweep

2016-09-20 Thread Guyer, Jonathan E. Dr. (Fed)
nt 'var' > > I am following exactly the same steps given in the original gist posting. Any > idea what might be wrong here ? > > > Krishna > > > > -Original Message- > From: fipy-boun...@nist.gov [mailto:fipy-boun...@nist.gov] On Behalf Of > Dan

RE: Dynamic under-relaxation factors for FiPy sweep

2016-09-19 Thread Gopalakrishnan, Krishnakumar
September 6, 2016 1:46 PM To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: Re: Dynamic under-relaxation factors for FiPy sweep On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Krishna wrote: > > Since python to be a very distributed ecosystem, this question for > some kind of a starter code, may not fit we

Re: Dynamic under-relaxation factors for FiPy sweep

2016-09-06 Thread Daniel Wheeler
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Krishna wrote: > > Since python to be a very distributed ecosystem, this question for some kind > of a starter code, may not fit well in a general/computational math > stackexchange post , nor in this mailing list. fipy's details are certainly > required to implem

Re: Dynamic under-relaxation factors for FiPy sweep

2016-09-06 Thread Krishna
f the general FiPy community. Best Regards, Krishna Original Message From: Daniel Wheeler Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 11:01 AM To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: Re: Dynamic under-relaxation factors for FiPy sweep >On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Gopalakrishnan, K

Re: Dynamic under-relaxation factors for FiPy sweep

2016-09-06 Thread Daniel Wheeler
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Gopalakrishnan, Krishnakumar wrote: > > I am trying to sweep for 8 field variables in FiPy, until all their residues > die down to appreciably small values. > > > > Currently, the convergence of this iterative loop is very slow. I have fixed > under-relaxation im