nt 'var'
>
> I am following exactly the same steps given in the original gist posting. Any
> idea what might be wrong here ?
>
>
> Krishna
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: fipy-boun...@nist.gov [mailto:fipy-boun...@nist.gov] On Behalf Of
> Dan
September 6, 2016 1:46 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Re: Dynamic under-relaxation factors for FiPy sweep
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Krishna wrote:
>
> Since python to be a very distributed ecosystem, this question for
> some kind of a starter code, may not fit we
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Krishna wrote:
>
> Since python to be a very distributed ecosystem, this question for some kind
> of a starter code, may not fit well in a general/computational math
> stackexchange post , nor in this mailing list. fipy's details are certainly
> required to implem
f the general FiPy community.
Best Regards,
Krishna
Original Message
From: Daniel Wheeler
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 11:01 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Re: Dynamic under-relaxation factors for FiPy sweep
>On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Gopalakrishnan, K
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Gopalakrishnan, Krishnakumar
wrote:
>
> I am trying to sweep for 8 field variables in FiPy, until all their residues
> die down to appreciably small values.
>
>
>
> Currently, the convergence of this iterative loop is very slow. I have fixed
> under-relaxation im