Decision at http://supreme.justia.com/us/555/07-608/
Roberts and Scalia argue in their dissent at
http://supreme.justia.com/us/555/07-608/dissent.html that the
construction of the statute is overbroad. No indication that it might be
flat-out unconstitutional. That was apparently not argued by t
I'm basing this on media reports.
This case dealt with the "Lautenberg Amendment" which disqualifies
someone from firearms ownership on the basis of a misdemeanor conviction
for domestic violence - and concluded that the category was broader than
crimes specifically called "domestic violence"
