Thanks! In spite of the effort of many to obfuscate this issue by proposing other, (and weaker) standards of review (e.g. Breyer's ridiculously subjective balancing test), strict scrutiny, IMHO is the proper standard. I'm glad some judge finally figured it out!
Dr. Ray Kessler Prof. of Criminal Justice P.S. Please feel free to check out my blog at http://crimelawandjustice.blogspot.com/ From: firearmsregprof-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:firearmsregprof-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Joseph E. Olson Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 9:52 AM To: List Firearms Reg Cc: postHeller Subject: Fwd: FW: Carrying concealed weapon decision Wisconsin Circuit Court applies strict scrutiny to strike down ban on concealed carry. "In sum, sec. 941.23 is unconstitutional on its face as overly broad in violation of the Second and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution." **************************************************************************** ************* Professor Joseph Olson, J.D., LL.M. o- 651-523-2142 Hamline University School of Law (MS-D2037) f- 651-523-2236 St. Paul, MN 55113-1235 c- 612-865-7956 jol...@gw.hamline.edu http://law.hamline.edu/node/784
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
