Very interesting article on McD v. Chicago.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704269004575073771717464954.ht
ml?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLTopStories
Ray Kessler
Prof. of Criminal Justice
Sul Ross State Univ.
___
To post, send message to
Tort practitioners, which I am in part, still look at duty, breach, causation,
and injury.? When looking at the "duty" there still is a distinction between
acting and failing to act, with acting more likely to generate a duty.? For
example, here in Washington State the courts ruled that there w
Interesting article on effects of demise of D.C.'s draconian gun laws.
http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/steve_chapman/2008/06/more-guns-more.htm
l
___
To post, send message to Firearmsregprof@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change o
Like many of you, I've been looking over the amicus briefs filed in favor of
D.C. Without naming names, some of the usual suspects seem to be using or
implying the arguments that if Heller wins, and the Court ignores the
alleged weight of judicial opinion, including overruling parts of Miller, it
some help! I'm looking for statistics on accidental shootings - the rate
vs. intentional shoots, how many were in the last year (or whenever the last
year data was compiled), rate of criminal convictions for accidental
shootings, etc. If you could point me to a specific website or something
that
A news account of another admission by scientists (National Research
Council) that current studies are not able to account for the effects
of firearms on violence -- the data does not support conclusions.
Phil
http://www.indystar.com/articles/9/202837-9659-010.html
Research on guns lacking, stu
On 2/12/04 11:32 AM, "Mike Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> To the general public, indeed I would say to most people, if the statement 4
> of 10 of weapons used to kill officers in the line of duty
> were the "Acme abc" model firearm, then it would be reasonable, not silly, for
> citizens
The main thing about the VPC result is that they counted as "AW" many guns
that theywant to be on the list, but are unlikely to ever be put
there.A more subtle complaint is that they counted _only_ what they
considered "AW"s as apart of the whole. It is entirely possible that
"4 out of 10"
