Sul Ross State University
From: firearmsregprof-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:firearmsregprof-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Nelson Lund
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 7:54 AM
To: posthel...@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Reg, List Firearms
Subject: Re: [postHeller] 42 USC 1981 does it all.
Let&#
Let's assume that Balkin's argument is correct. How is anyone going to
persuade any court (let alone the Supreme Court) to accept the
implications (whatever they may be) of what Balkin himself says was an
"inadvertent" so-called holding? That would require a rather significant
reorientation of
