, February 08, 2009 5:57 PM
To: Firearms Regulation List UCLA
Subject: Re: Negligence liability for proprietors who exclude
guns fromtheirproperty
Might be an interesting distinction, along the lines of (from
Torts 101, 30 years ago)--
If you see a drowning person, and decide it's more
int
gt; Eugene
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: firearmsregprof-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
>> [mailto:firearmsregprof-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of
>> dtha...@mindspring.com
>> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 5:57 PM
>> To: Firearms Regulation Li
ehalf Of
> dtha...@mindspring.com
> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 5:57 PM
> To: Firearms Regulation List UCLA
> Subject: Re: Negligence liability for proprietors who exclude
> guns fromtheirproperty
>
> Might be an interesting distinction, along the lines of (from
>
ot;
>Sent: Feb 8, 2009 6:49 PM
>To: Eugene Volokh , Firearms Regulation List UCLA
>
>Subject: Re: Negligence liability for proprietors who exclude guns
>fromtheirproperty
>
>I don't teach either torts or criminal law.
>
>With that intro, I've always th
