Hi all,
I've been thinking about a feature request that might be of use for us
lowly non-Firebird developers, hopefully in the 3.0 timeframe ;)
What: automatically keep track of databases once accessed on a server
and prese
INET/select_wait: select failed, errno = 10055 following by
SRVR_multi_thread/RECEIVE: error on main_port, shutting down => server freeze
-
Key:
On 12-04-2011 04:13, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>
> Adriano, I do not wnat nitpicking. Moreover, I agree that my commit was
> (not to say more) bad. But your initial solution with non-POD objects
> in API was also bad. I have not understood - do you see problems with
> replacing C++ classes with POD ob
On 12-04-2011 06:02, marius adrian popa wrote:
>
> ps:we really need a really good c++ for flamerobin and other c++
> toolkits :qt/wx
> How can i test the new api ? there is some doc or samples somewhere ?
>
I'll soon publish some tests at https://github.com/asfernandes/fbstuff.
Adriano
-
On 04/12/11 13:02, marius adrian popa wrote:
> How can i test the new api ? there is some doc or samples somewhere ?
I'm afraid that it's not ready for tests. If you look at current
samples, you\ll sooner of all say - it's awful. It's really not ready.
--
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Daniel Rail wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At April-07-11, 9:44 AM, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
>
>> I believe some form of queryInterface/upgradeInterface is required in
>> the API. But I don't think we should mimic IUnknown precisely without
>> really strong reasons. First of all, we
On 04/11/11 21:00, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> On 11-04-2011 13:25, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> On 04/11/11 20:19, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>>> On 11-04-2011 13:15, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
On 04/11/11 19:53, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> On 11-04-2011 07:28, Alex P
