[Firebird-devel] Performance of FW databases on ext4 filesystem

2011-08-28 Thread Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
All, After I bought a new machine, I reinstalled Ubuntu in new HDD with ext4 filesystem. While the new machine has much better CPU than the old one, I noticed the build being very slow where Firebird was creating databases. I found that mounting the ext4 partition with barrier=0 parameter decrea

Re: [Firebird-devel] Association of transactions, connections, and two-phase commit

2011-08-28 Thread Vlad Khorsun
> 28.08.2011 15:52, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >> Certainly, we can make API look like we_do_ join a new attachment to an >> existing distributed transaction. To do so we just start new transaction >> in API call internally (need to know TPB...) and join it with existing >> distributed transaction. > >

Re: [Firebird-devel] Association of transactions, connections, and two-phase commit

2011-08-28 Thread Vlad Khorsun
>> > Wouldn't it be better to join a new attachment to an existing >> > distributed transaction? >> >> No. Attachment *itself* can't participate in distributed transaction. At >> least >> not directly. Transaction of this attachment - can. Just understand: >> attachment >> *is not a* tra

Re: [Firebird-devel] Association of transactions, connections, and two-phase commit

2011-08-28 Thread Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
On 28-08-2011 11:51, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 28.08.2011 15:52, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >> Certainly, we can make API look like we_do_ join a new attachment to an >> existing distributed transaction. To do so we just start new transaction >> in API call internally (need to know TPB...) and join it

Re: [Firebird-devel] Association of transactions, connections, and two-phase commit

2011-08-28 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
28.08.2011 15:52, Alex Peshkoff wrote: > Certainly, we can make API look like we_do_ join a new attachment to an > existing distributed transaction. To do so we just start new transaction > in API call internally (need to know TPB...) and join it with existing > distributed transaction. What w

Re: [Firebird-devel] Association of transactions, connections, and two-phase commit

2011-08-28 Thread Alex Peshkoff
> > > > Wouldn't it be better to join a new attachment to an existing > > distributed transaction? > > No. Attachment *itself* can't participate in distributed transaction. At > least > not directly. Transaction of this attachment - can. Just understand: > attachment > *is not a* transa

Re: [Firebird-devel] control pannel bug windows7

2011-08-28 Thread Mark Rotteveel
On 28-8-2011 9:01, marius adrian popa wrote: > Is this bug still present with 2.5 ? > http://twitter.com/#!/ermsitgirl/status/107052676784721920 > > My guess is not , i will try it on a machine to see the status Installing with Control Panel applet works fine for me on Windows 7. Maybe related

[Firebird-devel] control pannel bug windows7

2011-08-28 Thread marius adrian popa
Is this bug still present with 2.5 ? http://twitter.com/#!/ermsitgirl/status/107052676784721920 My guess is not , i will try it on a machine to see the status -- EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K