[Firebird-devel] [FB-Tracker] Created: (CORE-3766) Transaction can`t change metadata if it is run in RC + no_wait and there is another connect that once had queried these metadata

2012-02-19 Thread Pavel Zotov (JIRA)
Transaction can`t change metadata if it is run in RC + no_wait and there is another connect that once had queried these metadata - Key: CORE-3766

Re: [Firebird-devel] Firebird License Incompatibilities

2012-02-19 Thread Pierre Arnaud
Sorry, my fault. I replied to the wrong message :-) -- no Colobot/Ceebot don't use Firebird. -Original Message- From: marius adrian popa [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: dimanche 19 février 2012 14:59 To: For discussion among Firebird Developers Subject: Re: [Firebird-devel] Firebird Licen

[Firebird-devel] CORE-3671

2012-02-19 Thread Mark Rotteveel
I finally got around to checking Vlad's fix for CORE-3671: it works, the access violation no longer occurs. If nothing else needs to happen it can be marked as resolved. Mark -- Mark Rotteveel -- Virtualization & Cloud

Re: [Firebird-devel] Firebird License Incompatibilities

2012-02-19 Thread marius adrian popa
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Pierre Arnaud wrote: > Hi, the original author of Colobot has also developed a derived game, > called CeeBot, for which he has already prepared a ZIP file with the > whole content: > > www.epsitec.ch/download/ceebot/ceebot.zip Does it use firebird ? or i don't see

Re: [Firebird-devel] CORE-3701 / JDBC-233 help needed

2012-02-19 Thread Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
On 19-02-2012 07:09, Mark Rotteveel wrote: > So if I could keep the sqllen untouched that would save me some work :) > You'd better leave sqllen untouched. Only changing the two first bytes of varying data to represent its length is fine. Adriano -

Re: [Firebird-devel] bin/164526: kill(1) can not kill process despite on -KILL

2012-02-19 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 12:16:39AM +0200, Коньков Евгений wrote: > repeated again: > bug is repeateable: > 1. radiusd + mod_perl + example.pl(it is connects to FireBird) + > FireBIrd > 2. restart firebird > 3. try to restart radiusd > 4. process in fall into STOP state > # ps awx | grep radi > 94

Re: [Firebird-devel] Firebird License Incompatibilities

2012-02-19 Thread Pierre Arnaud
Hi, the original author of Colobot has also developed a derived game, called CeeBot, for which he has already prepared a ZIP file with the whole content: www.epsitec.ch/download/ceebot/ceebot.zip Please tell me if this is OK for you, or if you really need the Colobot source tree, too. -Origi

Re: [Firebird-devel] bin/164526: kill(1) can not kill process despite on -KILL

2012-02-19 Thread Alan DeKok
Коньков Евгений wrote: > repeated again: > bug is repeateable: > 1. radiusd + mod_perl + example.pl(it is connects to FireBird) + Why? FreeRADIUS has native support for all major SQL servers. There's no need to use a Perl plugin. > FireBIrd > 2. restart firebird > 3. try to restart radiusd > 4

Re: [Firebird-devel] bin/164526: kill(1) can not kill process despite on -KILL

2012-02-19 Thread Alan Buxey
kill -9 doesn't want to play either? Read the docs/debugging file. Compile FR with debugging/developer stuff and run it under gdbm control and do your killing of firebird again. It's likely to be the PERL integration as thats what will get done in when firebird is restarted. Are you perl with

Re: [Firebird-devel] isc_info_firebird_version without database handle

2012-02-19 Thread Jiri Cincura
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >  On 02/19/12 13:53, Jiri Cincura wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: >>> You can use the service manager and ask it for isc_info_svc_server_version. >> That would require another connection, isn't it? > > Yes,

Re: [Firebird-devel] isc_info_firebird_version without database handle

2012-02-19 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 02/19/12 13:53, Jiri Cincura wrote: > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: >> You can use the service manager and ask it for isc_info_svc_server_version. > That would require another connection, isn't it? Yes, this requires svc manager connection.

Re: [Firebird-devel] isc_info_firebird_version without database handle

2012-02-19 Thread Jiri Cincura
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Mark Rotteveel wrote: > Out of curiosity: why do you want to know the version before attach? For some EF internals. -- Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com ---

Re: [Firebird-devel] isc_info_firebird_version without database handle

2012-02-19 Thread Jiri Cincura
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > You can use the service manager and ask it for isc_info_svc_server_version. That would require another connection, isn't it? -- Jiri {x2} Cincura (x2develop.com founder) http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com -

Re: [Firebird-devel] negative values performance info - Email found in subject

2012-02-19 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 02/18/12 21:27, Leyne, Sean wrote: > Björn, > >> Executing a query with a little bit longer execution time I get negative >> numbers for some values. Execution is done via IBExpert. Firebird ist 2.5.1 >> CS on Linux 64 bit Client Lib is 2.5.1 Windows 32 bit. >> >> Prepare time = 63ms >> Execu

Re: [Firebird-devel] CORE-3701 / JDBC-233 help needed

2012-02-19 Thread Mark Rotteveel
On 18-2-2012 22:38, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > 15.02.2012 20:01, Mark Rotteveel wrote: > >> Does SQL_VARYING require the sqllen to be updated as well, or can that >> be left as it was originally set by isc_dsql_describe_bind? > > I'd say it should correspond to the real data. You're not required to >

Re: [Firebird-devel] isc_info_firebird_version without database handle

2012-02-19 Thread Mark Rotteveel
On 18-2-2012 20:33, Jiri Cincura wrote: > Hi *, > > can I somehow ask for isc_info_firebird_version without database > handle? I'd like to know it before processing op_attach. > Out of curiosity: why do you want to know the version before attach? -- Mark Rotteveel --