> On 04/04/2012 11:12, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> Do you have better idea ?
>
> Yes, I do!
>
> If encryption detects (at start or after it) that database is in backup
> mode, it stops its activity and the next-page-to-encrypt will not advance.
>
> At merge time, if database is in encrypting st
Provide ability to return all columns using RETURNING (eg RETURNING *)
--
Key: CORE-3808
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3808
Project: Firebird Core
Issue Ty
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Kjell Rilbe wrote:
>
> OK, but that doesn't change what its current name seems to imply.
>
>
And it is the tool we have that fixes databases - with the mend option. Not
that I'd use it if I had a choice like IBSurgeon, but ...
Ann
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
>
> > 2. gfix -encrypt {-cryptpar} database
> > gfix passes plugin name and parameter in DPB, the rest of activity are
> > like in database validation. This implementation looks like most simple
> > to implement.
>
> No DPB hackery, please. G
04.04.2012 16:38, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> If encryption detects (at start or after it) that database is in backup
> mode, it stops its activity and the next-page-to-encrypt will not advance.
>
> At merge time, if database is in encrypting state, delta may be merged
> and encrypted, an
On 04/04/2012 11:12, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
> Do you have better idea ?
Yes, I do!
If encryption detects (at start or after it) that database is in backup
mode, it stops its activity and the next-page-to-encrypt will not advance.
At merge time, if database is in encrypting state, delta may be
> On 04/04/2012 10:32, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>>> On 04/04/2012 10:14, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
> Getting half-crypted DB copy is something too exotic :-)
Physical backup is "physical backup", i.e. page-level copy of a
database. It have
nothing common with encryption state, and i
On 04/04/2012 10:32, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> On 04/04/2012 10:14, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
Getting half-crypted DB copy is something too exotic :-)
>>> Physical backup is "physical backup", i.e. page-level copy of a
>>> database. It have
>>> nothing common with encryption state, and i see no
> On 04/04/2012 10:14, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>>> Getting half-crypted DB copy is something too exotic :-)
>>
>> Physical backup is "physical backup", i.e. page-level copy of a
>> database. It have
>> nothing common with encryption state, and i see no problem if physical
>> backup of
>> half-e
On 04/04/2012 10:14, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> Getting half-crypted DB copy is something too exotic :-)
> Physical backup is "physical backup", i.e. page-level copy of a
> database. It have
> nothing common with encryption state, and i see no problem if physical backup
> of
> half-encrypted dat
> I suppose that simultaneous encryption (changing encryption state of DB)
> and nbackup will not be possible.
Why ?
> Getting half-crypted DB copy is something too exotic :-)
Physical backup is "physical backup", i.e. page-level copy of a database.
It have
nothing common with encrypti
On 04/04/12 17:26, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:
>>> 3. Use of special utility: fbdbcrypt -encrypt {-cryptpar
>>> } {-verbose} local-database
>>> Certainly, appropriate support in services will be present.
>>> This method looks ugly at first, but it has one great advantage -
>>> ability to have s
On 04/04/12 15:18, Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Vlad Khorsun [mailto:hv...@users.sourceforge.net]
>> Sent: Martes, 03 de Abril de 2012 6:36
>>
>> Of course ! "single-user" operations is BAD in
>> *multy-user* software, let not
>> create one more...
> I
Kjell Rilbe skriver:
Dmitry Yemanov skriver:
Also possible as a secondary option, let's just decide what's better -
keep polluting GFIX with new features or create new command-line tools
for the every new feature (or a set of features).
From a user perspective, "gfix" sounds like a tool to f
Claudio Valderrama C. wrote:
> Would it call the INF functions to get that information? I ask because
> obviously gfix cannot work like gstat in local mode, IE we don't expect it
> to be able to read the page header directly.
Yes, isc_database_info() could be a solution here (if we really need a
Claudio Valderrama C. skriver:
-Original Message-
From: Kjell Rilbe [mailto:kjell.ri...@datadia.se]
Sent: Miércoles, 04 de Abril de 2012 6:56
From a user perspective, "gfix" sounds like a tool to fix
problems with
the database, so I'd vote to either change the name to something more
ge
> -Original Message-
> From: Dmitry Yemanov [mailto:firebi...@yandex.ru]
> Sent: Miércoles, 04 de Abril de 2012 6:42
> To: For discussion among Firebird Developers
>
> No DPB hackery, please. GFIX could finally start doing
> something itself.
> For example, run ALTER DATABASE ENCRYPT as
> -Original Message-
> From: Kjell Rilbe [mailto:kjell.ri...@datadia.se]
> Sent: Miércoles, 04 de Abril de 2012 6:56
>
> From a user perspective, "gfix" sounds like a tool to fix
> problems with
> the database, so I'd vote to either change the name to something more
> generic, e.g. "g
Dmitry Yemanov skriver:
Also possible as a secondary option, let's just decide what's better -
keep polluting GFIX with new features or create new command-line tools
for the every new feature (or a set of features).
From a user perspective, "gfix" sounds like a tool to fix problems with
the da
04.04.2012 12:42, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> let's just decide what's better -
> keep polluting GFIX with new features or create new command-line tools
> for the every new feature (or a set of features).
If the feature is available via Services API, fbsvcmgr already exists.
--
SY, SD.
--
03.04.2012 11:55, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> To work with encrypted database file we need a tool to encrypt database.
> I see 3 possible solutions for it. In all 3 cases some plugin dependent
> parameter may be passed to plugin. In all cases one may use decrypt
> instead encrypt to make
>
> 1. ALTER D
> -Original Message-
> From: Vlad Khorsun [mailto:hv...@users.sourceforge.net]
> Sent: Martes, 03 de Abril de 2012 6:36
>
> Of course ! "single-user" operations is BAD in
> *multy-user* software, let not
> create one more...
I await to see IO numbers with gfix, gbak, gstat, nbackup
Error "Invalid expression in the select list" can be unexpectedly raised if a
string literal is used inside a GROUP BY clause in a multi-byte connection
-
23 matches
Mail list logo
