Maybe this post found on necessitas could be usefull to port firebird
server to android :
--
Hello everyone,
We've faced some big problems which prevent us to release alpha4 SDK,
so, I think we own you some explanations why we delay it that much.
First problem we've encountered it w
Maybe this post found on necessitas could be usefull to port firebird
server to android :
--
Hello everyone,
We've faced some big problems which prevent us to release alpha4 SDK,
so, I think we own you some explanations why we delay it that much.
First problem we've encountered it w
On 22/08/2012 12:41, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 22.08.2012 17:35, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> Sorry, this is not good.
>>
>> Better alternatives: RDB$DB_TRANSACTION, RDB$DB_TRANSACTION_ID,
>> RDB$TRANSACTION_ID...
> "DB" prefix is not good because it is not "DB" value.
It has the same m
22.08.2012 19:35, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> What about RDB$DB_VERSION?
>>
> Sorry, this is not good.
>
> Better alternatives: RDB$DB_TRANSACTION, RDB$DB_TRANSACTION_ID,
Simply RDB$RECORD_VERSION? ;-)
> RDB$TRANSACTION_ID...
We have a column in RDB$TRANSACTIONS named this way.
Dmi
22.08.2012 17:35, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> Sorry, this is not good.
>
> Better alternatives: RDB$DB_TRANSACTION, RDB$DB_TRANSACTION_ID,
> RDB$TRANSACTION_ID...
RDB$TRANSACTION_ID is already used in monitoring tables. "DB" prefix is not
good
because it is not "DB" value.
If sug
On 22/08/2012 12:31, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> What about RDB$DB_VERSION?
>
Sorry, this is not good.
Better alternatives: RDB$DB_TRANSACTION, RDB$DB_TRANSACTION_ID,
RDB$TRANSACTION_ID...
Adriano
--
Live Sec
What about RDB$DB_VERSION?
Should it return 32-bit value or we'd better start with 64-bit?
And I suppose updated-by-current-transaction record should return
current transaction number, right?
Adriano
On 20/08/2012 07:03, Dimitry Sibiryakov (JIRA) wrote:
> [
> http://tracker.firebirdsql.
