Re: [Firebird-devel] RFC - FB 3.0 IPv6 support

2012-09-12 Thread Ben Green
Hello Everyone, Further to my previous email, I have looked again at my patch and adapted it to work with the new versions of Firebird. I am having some difficulty getting the current HEAD Firebird 3.0 running on Linux, although it is working fine in Windows. Anyway, the updated patch, tested

Re: [Firebird-devel] Restore improvements?

2012-09-12 Thread Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
On 12/09/2012 02:54, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote: > gbak restore performance is bound to the performance of a single > core/CPU, thus running the index creation process in parallel, sounds > encouraging. This is even getting more important (worse) with a faster > I/O system (SSD ...). I'm not talki

Re: [Firebird-devel] Restore improvements?

2012-09-12 Thread Kjell Rilbe
Den 2012-09-12 00:20 skrev Dmitry Kuzmenko såhär: > I think here OS cache is more sufficient, especially for databases > that bigger than RAM. Here one thought came to me, that was inspired > by Vlad Horsun - to restore all indices per table, table by table, not > that way like gbak restores ind