>> This change seems to be absolutely safe no matter of what more
>> performance optimizations we will try later.
>
> I'd also start with this solution first.
Done.
Regards,
Vlad
--
November Webinars for C, C++, For
> On 04/11/2013 07:52, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
PS Adriano already complains about slowness of CREATE DATABASE in fb3 (see
thread
"Reason for slow CREATE DATABASE in FB 3 (Linux)" started at 15 dec
2011), i'll look
at it again in a next few days.
As far as I rem
> Hello, what's the performace penalty for using an AtomicCounter?
It is noticeable (comparing with single int's) but common effect depends on
how often it
is used. In short - it could be measured in CPU-bound load and it is close to
zero at
IO-bound load.
> I see in
> cch.h, inside
> cl
On 05/28/13 19:30, Jim Starkey wrote:
> I agree completely with your analysis and the contrary conclusion. But
> don't feel too bad -- the MySQL security handshake also suffers from a
> man-in-the-middle vulnerability wide enough to drive a truck through
> that wasn't recognized until I took a c
On 11/06/13 18:37, Philippe Makowski wrote:
> Le 06/11/2013 07:34, Alex Peshkoff a écrit :
>> Looks like I've forgotten to mention that I've tried debug build, which
>> has -Wall except 4 warnings.
>> But I will anyway try 4.8.2 and report number of warnings for both Debug
>> & Release.
>>
> you ca
