Re: [Firebird-devel] Tackling CORE-4526 (OFFSET FETCH)

2014-11-27 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
28.11.2014 00:15, Mark Rotteveel wrote: > Interesting, I assume that is for dialect 1 as it doesn't have quoting? Supposedly, yes. This trick was inherited from InterBase and we try to maintain it (when it's not forgotten :-). > Sounds like a plan :) > > I will address the keyword_or_column and

Re: [Firebird-devel] Tackling CORE-4526 (OFFSET FETCH)

2014-11-27 Thread Mark Rotteveel
On 27-11-2014 17:12, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > 26.11.2014 18:52, Mark Rotteveel wrote: >> What do you want me to do? > > Keep your current solution. > >>> 3) New reserved words (OFFSET and ROW) should be added to the >>> keyword_or_column rule to simplify migration. That said, I'm wondering >>> why R

Re: [Firebird-devel] Tackling CORE-4526 (OFFSET FETCH)

2014-11-27 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
26.11.2014 18:52, Mark Rotteveel wrote: > > I initially had a similar implementation (slightly more complex), but I > decided to extend select_expr so the new production reads more like the > production in the SQL standard: > > Compare parse.y: > select_expr > : ... > | with_clause sele

Re: [Firebird-devel] Use 64-bit fbclient.dll

2014-11-27 Thread Alexey Pavlov
2014-11-27 12:47 GMT+04:00 Dimitry Sibiryakov : > 27.11.2014 9:40, Alexpux wrote: > > I’m already build debug version of firebird. > > I'm set breakpoint on is_attach_database (why.cpp:1361) but it not go > there - it just segfault on calling is_attach_database without going to > this proc. So I t

Re: [Firebird-devel] Use 64-bit fbclient.dll

2014-11-27 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
27.11.2014 9:40, Alexpux wrote: > I’m already build debug version of firebird. > I'm set breakpoint on is_attach_database (why.cpp:1361) but it not go there - > it just segfault on calling is_attach_database without going to this proc. So > I think this is can be calling convention issue. Dis

Re: [Firebird-devel] Use 64-bit fbclient.dll

2014-11-27 Thread Alexpux
> 26 нояб. 2014 г., в 22:32, Dimitry Sibiryakov написал(а): > > 26.11.2014 20:01, Alexpux wrote: > >> We think this maybe the issue for 64-bit as 64-bit don’t use stdcall >> convention. > > It doesn't matter, calling convention attribute is silently (or with > warning) ignored > on 64 bit