Yes, build_file.epp/build_file.cpp of course. Sorry.
On 2 February 2015 at 16:45, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 02.02.2015 13:44, Egor Pugin wrote:
>> Any other comments?
>
>There is no build_msg.cpp file. If you have on mind build_file.cpp, then
> it just has a
> check for connect errors miss
02.02.2015 13:44, Egor Pugin wrote:
> Any other comments?
There is no build_msg.cpp file. If you have on mind build_file.cpp, then it
just has a
check for connect errors missed. Perhaps, it should be preprocessed with
different gpre
settings.
--
WBR, SD.
--
Any other comments?
On 31 January 2015 at 22:30, Egor Pugin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> build_msg -D msg.fdb -P ./ -F firebird.msg -L all
> when msg.fdb is absent will result in infinite loop.
>
> I have the simple fix - try to open specified file, but maybe someone
> has better solution.
> http://pastebin.
Possible deadlock in firebird connect.
--
Key: CORE-4680
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4680
Project: Firebird Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Engine
Affects Versions: 3.0 B
02.02.2015 12:58, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> PS. Certainly I agree that for such builds splitting file makes sense,
> but I wanted to explain my initial POV.
From any POV a header file which have 10k lines that aren't used is a mess.
99% of
modules is using interfaces, not implementing them, so t
On 02/02/15 14:35, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 02.02.2015 12:28, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> If it really helps you to build during 45 min instead 1.5 hours change
>> does make sense.
>> But what*HUGE* solution do you build?
> Firebird3
>
>> < Somewhy I think you are not using computer on 486 CPU:
On 02/02/2015 09:28, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> On 02/02/15 14:04, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>> 02.02.2015 12:00, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>>> So split the files manually and report the time differences.
>> I see two times speed up for a module that uses Interfaces.h. 14k lines
>> is a
02.02.2015 12:28, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> If it really helps you to build during 45 min instead 1.5 hours change
> does make sense.
> But what*HUGE* solution do you build?
Firebird3
> < Somewhy I think you are not using computer on 486 CPU:) >
No, it is quite modern AMD A4-1250 1GHz. CPU
On 02/02/15 14:04, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 02.02.2015 12:00, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> So split the files manually and report the time differences.
> I see two times speed up for a module that uses Interfaces.h. 14k lines
> is a big bunch
> of
>
If it really helps you to
02.02.2015 12:00, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> So split the files manually and report the time differences.
I see two times speed up for a module that uses Interfaces.h. 14k lines is a
big bunch
of
--
WBR, SD.
On 02/02/2015 08:53, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 02.02.2015 11:48, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> It can be split, but is speed of compilation really a problem?
>At my computer full build of solution takes about an hour and a half. Yes,
> this is a
> problem, especially because MSVC doesn't stop com
02.02.2015 11:48, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> It can be split, but is speed of compilation really a problem?
At my computer full build of solution takes about an hour and a half. Yes,
this is a
problem, especially because MSVC doesn't stop compilation after errors.
--
WBR, SD.
--
On 01/30/15 22:01, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 30.01.2015 17:53, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> There are template envelopes at both sides.
> BTW, I think that this header should be split into two. It can speed up
> compilation.
>
It can be split, but is speed of compilation really a problem?
On 01/30/15 21:33, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 30.01.2015 18:59, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> It's not complete, for example, for Pascal.
> I.e. you have no idea how to transform you IDL to Pascal code, have you?..
As far as I can see simple examples are transformed to Pascal success
14 matches
Mail list logo
