> On Jul 1, 2015, at 9:34 AM, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
>
> 01.07.2015 13:49, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>
>>> Not sure what you mean by same? Let's say I change it from smallint to int.
>>
>> All kind of numbers have the same representation in index keys.
>
> Except BIGINT, IIRC.
>
Which was a mista
User without admin role gets slightly different messages about not found record
depending on UserManager = Legacy_UserManager vs Srp
Key: CORE-4853
01.07.2015 16:34, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> 01.07.2015 13:49, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>
>>> Not sure what you mean by same? Let's say I change it from smallint to int.
>>
>> All kind of numbers have the same representation in index keys.
>
> Except BIGINT, IIRC.
Correct.
Regards,
Vlad
PS One can f
01.07.2015 13:49, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>> Not sure what you mean by same? Let's say I change it from smallint to int.
>
> All kind of numbers have the same representation in index keys.
Except BIGINT, IIRC.
Dmitry
--
D
>Look at execution statistics. If commit took more time than expected
> (few ms), performs a lot of fetches\marks, etc - it could be sign that
> index(es) was rebuild.
Thanks. I'm testing now on empty database, just to see what's possible. I'll
generate some data.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Inde
01.07.2015 13:34, Jiří Činčura wrote:
>> If new datatype is the same from index POV, there is no need to rebuild
>> index.
>
> Not sure what you mean by same? Let's say I change it from smallint to int.
All kind of numbers have the same representation in index keys. So, in the
case above th
>If new datatype is the same from index POV, there is no need to rebuild
> index.
Not sure what you mean by same? Let's say I change it from smallint to int.
> Else, IIRC, engine rebuild all indices dependent on domain-based fields.
> You can check it yourself, btw :)
How?
--
Mgr. Jiří Či
conversion error from string "" when doing INNER JOIN with empty result set.
Key: CORE-4852
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4852
Project: Firebird Core
Hello,
Ok, well.
My use case is in short words:
Some SPs calling other SPs with dynamically built SQL code executed
with execute statement or for execute loops.
Error handling is hardened with a when any statement after special
handling of "expected" errors.
In that when an
On Wednesday 01 July 2015 11:34:08 Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> 24.06.2015 11:50, Paul Reeves wrote:
> > The 64-bit windows build of the employee db is broken.
>
> Can you confirm that the issue is gone now?
>
>
Yes. Adriano supplied a fix and tagged it for Beta 2. I've checked that
make_examples.bat
24.06.2015 11:50, Paul Reeves wrote:
>
> The 64-bit windows build of the employee db is broken.
Can you confirm that the issue is gone now?
Dmitry
--
Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
GigeNET's Cloud Solu
01.07.2015 12:14, Jiří Činčura wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> Firebird allows me to change domain's datatype even if column with this
> domain is used in an index.
> Is it OK or should the index be dropped and created again?
If new datatype is the same from index POV, there is no need to rebuild
index.
Hi *,
Firebird allows me to change domain's datatype even if column with this domain
is used in an index. Is it OK or should the index be dropped and created again?
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
--
Don
13 matches
Mail list logo
