Em 05/03/2016 12:38, Dimitry Sibiryakov escreveu:
> 05.03.2016 16:28, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> Has the conflicts increased with your patch?
>
> No.
>
>> Can I see it? There is different ways to do this.
>
> Attached.
>
I see two bugs with your implementation. Both of these co
On 05/03/16 13:32, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>Currently parser enforce attribute clauses to have a definite positions in
> the
> statement. SQL standard doesn't require that.
>Do you agree that position-insensitive clauses would be more convenient?
It would be nice if we did not have re-
"Alter sequence restart with" does not change the initial value
---
Key: CORE-5133
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-5133
Project: Firebird Core
Issue Type: Bug
Af
05.03.2016 16:28, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Has the conflicts increased with your patch?
No.
Can I see it? There is different ways to do this.
Attached.
--
WBR, SD.
Sequence.diff.7z
Description: Binary data
-
Em 05/03/2016 11:08, Dimitry Sibiryakov escreveu:
> 05.03.2016 14:57, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> Are you talking only about SEQUENCEs?
>
>For now - yes. I have patch for sequences only.
>
My worry is about conflicts when this is done for more commands.
BTW, shouldn't con
Hello,
> Afaik, gbak will not initialize anything :)
Yes, that's the problem with the new security concept :-)
> Did you try to restore using an embedded connection?
No, not embedded, but via IP.
But I think it makes no difference as the error is the same when
there is no initia
Incorrect value for RDB$FIELD_LENGTH for CHAR/VARCHAR columns in system table
-
Key: CORE-5132
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-5132
Project: Firebird Core
05.03.2016 16:32, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>
> Currently parser enforce attribute clauses to have a definite positions in the
> statement. SQL standard doesn't require that.
> Do you agree that position-insensitive clauses would be more convenient?
Agreed.
> BTW, shouldn't conflicts in dictionar
05.03.2016 14:57, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> Are you talking only about SEQUENCEs?
For now - yes. I have patch for sequences only.
>> >BTW, shouldn't conflicts in dictionary to be fixed?..
>> >
> Hum?
> btyacc: 32 shift/reduce conflicts, 11 reduce/reduce conflicts.
--
WBR
Em 05/03/2016 10:32, Dimitry Sibiryakov escreveu:
>Hello, All.
>
>Currently parser enforce attribute clauses to have a definite positions in
> the
> statement. SQL standard doesn't require that.
>Do you agree that position-insensitive clauses would be more convenient?
>
Are you tal
Hello, All.
Currently parser enforce attribute clauses to have a definite positions in
the
statement. SQL standard doesn't require that.
Do you agree that position-insensitive clauses would be more convenient?
BTW, shouldn't conflicts in dictionary to be fixed?..
--
WBR, SD.
-
05.03.2016 15:45, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> Must I ask for approval before committing tiny changes such as fixing of
> mistypes in
> comments and spaces?
Nope.
Dmitry
--
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface a
Must I ask for approval before committing tiny changes such as fixing of
mistypes in
comments and spaces?
--
WBR, SD.
--
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo
03.03.2016 19:46, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 03.03.2016 17:38, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
>> Pretty no difference for short hash strings, thanks.
>
> Your conclusion is...?
I don't see much value, but it looks like it does not hurt either. Feel
free to commit.
Dmitry
Log Firebird Server
---
Key: CORE-5131
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-5131
Project: Firebird Core
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.0 RC2
Environment: Windows 10 x64, Memory 16GB
Re
Hello,
how can i initialize the alternative security database during
restore with non sysdba db owner?
I'm trying to restore a fb 2.5 database over database which should
have a build in security database afterwards on a server where I
don't have sysdba permissions.
I'm
16 matches
Mail list logo
