26.04.2018 15:14, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
I repeat that I find that odd.
So do I. But that's the way it works in Firebird. Before 3.0.2 it worked in a little
different way and key holder could delay calling of application's callback until it is
really needed. Now it is impossible.
--
On 26-4-2018 15:05, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
26.04.2018 15:01, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Do you mean to say that the database encryption plugin doesn't know
about the keyname used for encryption? That seems rather odd.
At the point when encryption plugin knows database key, no
application
On 26-4-2018 14:56, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
26.04.2018 14:52, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
I'm not sure if that may also lead to problems for database encryption
plugins that need database-specific information to correctly perform
the callback (eg the keyname used?).
It is impossible in any
26.04.2018 14:52, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
I'm not sure if that may also lead to problems for database encryption plugins that need
database-specific information to correctly perform the callback (eg the keyname used?).
It is impossible in any case. No encryption plugin that use database info
On 26-4-2018 14:28, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 04/26/18 15:23, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
I don't receive a callback from Firebird for service operations
involving an encrypted database, so I can't respond to it.
That's very strange. Is protocol version correct? You should
On 26-4-2018 14:28, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 04/26/18 15:23, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
I don't receive a callback from Firebird for service operations
involving an encrypted database, so I can't respond to it.
That's very strange. Is protocol version correct? You should
On 04/26/18 15:09, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 26-4-2018 13:45, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 04/26/18 14:11, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 26-4-2018 12:28, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
You understood me wrong - database encryption callback is supported
in services
On 26-4-2018 14:16, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
26.04.2018 14:09, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Encryption keys can be (or IMO should be) database specific, so the
callback will need to have database-specific information.
Let me explain: the callback is set by an application. The
application must
26.04.2018 14:09, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Encryption keys can be (or IMO should be) database specific, so the callback will need to
have database-specific information.
Let me explain: the callback is set by an application. The application must know
exactly which database it will work with and
On 26-4-2018 13:45, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 04/26/18 14:11, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 26-4-2018 12:28, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
You understood me wrong - database encryption callback is supported
in services connections. _UTILITY_ gstat supports only -h and -e
On 04/26/18 14:11, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 26-4-2018 12:28, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
You understood me wrong - database encryption callback is supported
in services connections. _UTILITY_ gstat supports only -h and -e
switches. It is not related with protocol but has some
On 26-4-2018 12:28, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
You understood me wrong - database encryption callback is supported in
services connections. _UTILITY_ gstat supports only -h and -e switches.
It is not related with protocol but has some relation with services
manager - this utility
On 04/26/18 11:34, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 26-4-2018 10:11, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 04/26/18 10:31, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 24-4-2018 12:03, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
Mark sorry but looks like I've already answered this many times -
the only 2 gstat
On 26-4-2018 10:11, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 04/26/18 10:31, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 24-4-2018 12:03, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
Mark sorry but looks like I've already answered this many times - the
only 2 gstat functions that will currently work with encrypted
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Transactional_DDL_in_PostgreSQL:_A_Competitive_Analysis
1. We can too (but there are errors:
http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-5763)
2. There ara Firebird in list, but without link to documentation.
3. We can't mix ddl and dml like this (PostgreSql can):
On 04/26/18 10:31, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 24-4-2018 12:03, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
Mark sorry but looks like I've already answered this many times - the
only 2 gstat functions that will currently work with encrypted
database are print header (-h) and print crypt statistics
On 24-4-2018 12:03, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
Mark sorry but looks like I've already answered this many times - the
only 2 gstat functions that will currently work with encrypted database
are print header (-h) and print crypt statistics (-e).
It was the first time I asked, and I
17 matches
Mail list logo
