06.03.2019 18:26, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes пишет:
On 04/03/2019 11:08, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 04/03/2019 10:57, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 3/4/19 3:15 PM, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
04.03.2019 14:01, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 3/4/19 2:57 PM, Vlad
On 04/03/2019 11:08, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> On 04/03/2019 10:57, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
>> On 3/4/19 3:15 PM, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>>> 04.03.2019 14:01, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 3/4/19 2:57 PM, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
> I have additional
On 04/03/2019 11:08, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> On 04/03/2019 10:57, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
>> On 3/4/19 3:15 PM, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>>> 04.03.2019 14:01, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 3/4/19 2:57 PM, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
> I have additional
On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 14:33:49 +0100
Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>
> Srp is not a legacy authentication, it is just slightly less secure
> than Srp256
I'm wondering then if I understand the difference between AuthServer and
AuthClient. My understanding is that AuthServer specifies the plugins
the
On 6-3-2019 13:33, Paul Reeves wrote:
The installer in FB4 Beta 1 doesn't implement this option correctly,
simply because srp256 is not included if the user checks the box. That
is simple to fix.
However the underlying problem is more complex. We now have two forms
of legacy auth (without an
