> > Am I missing something ?
> Yes. New binding operator described in README.set_bind.md.
> WBR, SD.
Thank you ! It works great with
set bind of timestamp with time zone to legacy;
instead of
set time zone bind legacy; -- As I understood from Release Notes.
This speeds up the upgrade pro
09.01.2020 20:09, Evelyne Girard wrote:
Am I missing something ?
Yes. New binding operator described in README.set_bind.md.
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
Hi,
When I try to use "set time zone bind legacy" as explained in
http://web.firebirdsql.org/downloads/prerelease/v40beta1/Firebird-4.0.0_Beta1-ReleaseNotes.pdf,
I get an error indicating "bind" is not recognized :
SQL> set time zone bind legacy;
Statement failed, SQLSTATE = 42000
Dynamic SQL E
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2020/01/pgp-keys-software-security-and-much-more-threatened-by-new-sha1-exploit/
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
09.01.2020 16:26, Paul Reeves wrote:
CMakeLists.txt is not the definitive package list. It is just for CMake,
isn't it?
Yes. But it (and also script in build_win32) are shipped in the packages and supposed
to be used to build the examples after installation AFAIU. Both of them refer dyn and
09.01.2020 16:10, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Better IMO: remove GPRE (and QLI) from the kits.
I may agree re. QLI (starting with FB4), but GPRE is known to be still
used. And yes, they're sponsors ;-) That said, I suppose GPRE will also
disappear one day, just later.
Dmitry
Fir
Enable delivery of known to the client key to any connection to the server
--
Key: CORE-6220
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-6220
Project: Firebird Core
On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 15:42:50 +0100
Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 09.01.2020 13:53, Paul Reeves wrote:
> > So the question should whether to include dynamic gpre examples in the
> > packages or just remove them from the repo. As far as I know they have
> > been deprecated for a long while and have no
09.01.2020 13:53, Paul Reeves wrote:
So the question should whether to include dynamic gpre examples in the
packages or just remove them from the repo. As far as I know they have been
deprecated for a long while and have not been shipped in the product since
maybe even InterBase days.
On the
09.01.2020 14:37, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
- If they want to use not-updated tools, why they need to get these
tools from fresh versions?
For this question there is a simple answer: because these utilities are
version-dependent.
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web i
On 09/01/2020 10:15, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
> On 2020-01-09 16:10, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> Better IMO: remove GPRE (and QLI) from the kits.
>
> As far as I know people still use them both for their legacy
> applications.
>
So it would be good to also know:
- How ma
On 2020-01-09 16:10, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Better IMO: remove GPRE (and QLI) from the kits.
As far as I know people still use them both for their legacy applications.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
Better IMO: remove GPRE (and QLI) from the kits.
Adriano
On 09/01/2020 09:53, Paul Reeves wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 13:14:22 +0100
> Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>
>>Hello, All.
>>
>>Currently distributed packages include GPRE but not examples for it.
>> Shouldn't it be either both or n
On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 13:14:22 +0100
Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>Hello, All.
>
>Currently distributed packages include GPRE but not examples for it.
> Shouldn't it be either both or none?
>
To be more precise, the static examples are included the dynamic ones are not.
So the question sho
DECFLOAT values and queries with ORDER BY and/or windowed (analitical) functions
Key: CORE-6219
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-6219
Project: Firebird Cor
Hello, All.
Currently distributed packages include GPRE but not examples for it. Shouldn't it be
either both or none?
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
16 matches
Mail list logo
