Thank you Pablo.
I will do so.
Atenciosamente,
Em qui., 28 de mai. de 2020 às 16:46, pablo sanchez
escreveu:
> Hugo, consider getting a copy of "Migration Guide to Firebird 3" written
> by Carlos H. Cantu. Very useful form migrating from v 2.5.x to v 3 .
>
> Regards
> Pablo
>
>
> > Hello >
Hugo, consider getting a copy of "Migration Guide to Firebird 3" written
by Carlos H. Cantu. Very useful form migrating from v 2.5.x to v 3 .
Regards
Pablo
Hello >
Currentelly I am using FB 2.5.9 in Windows 7, 10, 2008, 2012, 2016, 32
and 64 bits.
I will star testing FB 4.
Is there some d
>If by default SRP is not initialized then by default it must not be in
> list of auth
> plugins and vice versa if it is in the default list, it must be always ready
> to work.
Completely agree!
The fact that SRP is an available option does not mean that it should be in the
default list
Main problem is that security database initialization must be documented
somewhere for FB4,
and I think the best place is FB4 Quick Start Guide, because it fits
nicely to chapters like Installing and Server configuration.
And that Quick Start Guide PDF should be included in installation
packages
28.05.2020 11:59, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
I remember very well when I myself first installed interbase 5.6 >20 years ago, and lost a
few hours searching for default SYSDBA password (masterkey). Now it looks funny, that time
I was close to uninstall and forget about interbase. Tha
On 2020-05-28 12:37, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 2020-05-28 11:22, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 2020-05-28 12:06, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
28.05.2020 00:35, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
It's more confusing to have a "functional" security database without
users
No SRP use
On 2020-05-28 11:22, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 2020-05-28 12:06, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
28.05.2020 00:35, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
It's more confusing to have a "functional" security database without
users
No SRP users doesn't also mean no legacy or SSPI users
On 2020-05-28 00:35, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 27/05/2020 17:54, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Not having users at all is just a special case of not having the right
username or password. The error for the end-user should be the same in
both cases.
That the administrator gets the same er
28.05.2020 11:22, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
We talk about a message which should be as clear as possible for novice.
I still see no need for this message for novices.
As was already said case "no such user" is not different from "wrong password for this
user" and "no one user
On 2020-05-28 12:06, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
28.05.2020 00:35, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
It's more confusing to have a "functional" security database without
users
No SRP users doesn't also mean no legacy or SSPI users.
Certainly, but in this case the best solution is to remov
28.05.2020 00:35, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
It's more confusing to have a "functional" security database without
users
No SRP users doesn't also mean no legacy or SSPI users.
Possibility to work without SYSDBA account is a feature not bug.
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing
On 2020-05-27 19:18, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
27.05.2020 15:14, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 27/05/2020 08:56, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
isc_missing_data_structures is former
Install incomplete, please read the Compatibility chapter in the
release notes for this version
It could be changed to
12 matches
Mail list logo