Re: [Firebird-devel] Backup/restore vs ACLs

2013-02-21 Thread Dimitry Sibiryakov
21.02.2013 13:49, Alex Peshkoff wrote: > Please kill that support - if you have not done it yet:-) IMHO, BLR also don't need to be backed up since PSQL sources security is (?) introduced. -- WBR, SD. -- Everyone

Re: [Firebird-devel] Backup/restore vs ACLs

2013-02-21 Thread Alex Peshkoff
On 02/09/13 17:38, Dmitry Yemanov wrote: > All, > > Historically, we backup and restore security classes with names not > starting with 'SQL'. Regular security classes are SQL-based and they're > recreated at the commit (DFW) time, so there's really no sense in > transporting them back and forth. S

[Firebird-devel] Backup/restore vs ACLs

2013-02-09 Thread Dmitry Yemanov
All, Historically, we backup and restore security classes with names not starting with 'SQL'. Regular security classes are SQL-based and they're recreated at the commit (DFW) time, so there's really no sense in transporting them back and forth. So I suppose that backup/restore support is prese