On 6-3-2019 16:18, Paul Reeves wrote:
On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 14:33:49 +0100
Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Srp is not a legacy authentication, it is just slightly less secure
than Srp256
I'm wondering then if I understand the difference between AuthServer and
AuthClient. My understanding is that AuthServ
On 3/6/19 6:18 PM, Paul Reeves wrote:
On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 14:33:49 +0100
Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Srp is not a legacy authentication, it is just slightly less secure
than Srp256
I'm wondering then if I understand the difference between AuthServer and
AuthClient. My understanding is that AuthServ
On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 14:33:49 +0100
Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>
> Srp is not a legacy authentication, it is just slightly less secure
> than Srp256
I'm wondering then if I understand the difference between AuthServer and
AuthClient. My understanding is that AuthServer specifies the plugins
the serve
On 6-3-2019 13:33, Paul Reeves wrote:
The installer in FB4 Beta 1 doesn't implement this option correctly,
simply because srp256 is not included if the user checks the box. That
is simple to fix.
However the underlying problem is more complex. We now have two forms
of legacy auth (without an und
The installer in FB4 Beta 1 doesn't implement this option correctly,
simply because srp256 is not included if the user checks the box. That
is simple to fix.
However the underlying problem is more complex. We now have two forms
of legacy auth (without an underscore) - srp for Firebird 3 and
leg
