On 27-7-2019 14:35, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 27-7-2019 14:16, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 27/07/2019 07:57, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
When working on my pull request for FLOAT, I noticed that the way that
the precision fragments (ie precision_opt and precision_opt_nz) works in
the gramma
On 27-7-2019 14:16, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 27/07/2019 07:57, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
When working on my pull request for FLOAT, I noticed that the way that
the precision fragments (ie precision_opt and precision_opt_nz) works in
the grammar yields non-intuitive error messages.
For
On 27/07/2019 07:57, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> When working on my pull request for FLOAT, I noticed that the way that
> the precision fragments (ie precision_opt and precision_opt_nz) works in
> the grammar yields non-intuitive error messages.
>
> For example, a negative precision just yields an unc
When working on my pull request for FLOAT, I noticed that the way that
the precision fragments (ie precision_opt and precision_opt_nz) works in
the grammar yields non-intuitive error messages.
For example, a negative precision just yields an unclear
"""
Token unknown - line 10, column 20
-
"""