31.05.2016 21:55, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> On 31/05/2016 13:58, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>> Yes, you could save time you wasted protecting status quo with simple
>> "why not, it
>> won't hurt". If you didn't noticed, I just suggested to add a rule to guide,
>> not to start
>> re
On 31/05/2016 13:58, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>Yes, you could save time you wasted protecting status quo with simple "why
> not, it
> won't hurt". If you didn't noticed, I just suggested to add a rule to guide,
> not to start
> rewriting code.
>
Your rule breaks the most used class in the
31.05.2016 18:41, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> Function is used to merge lists of client and server plugins. I doubt
> it's worth optimization.
I know what it does. Problem is that it does something more, something that
is not
obvious from first glance.
> Certainly pop
> performs constructor, it c
On 05/31/2016 06:55 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 31.05.2016 17:34, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> I hardly believe strings can affect performance seriously.
>> They are typically not used for objects in deep layers.
> Yes, I doubt that these little things can win more than a couple of
> percents,
On 31/05/2016 13:24, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 31.05.2016 18:14, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> We don't need to be aware of non important things, string must be easy
>> to use, period.
>Then you cannot be sure that none of these places is performance critical.
>Speed of code writ
On 05/31/2016 07:14 PM, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> On 31/05/2016 13:09, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>> 31.05.2016 17:54, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>>> String class is general class to be used everywhere except in
>>> performance needed code.
>>>
>>> As a general class, should be
31.05.2016 18:14, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> We don't need to be aware of non important things, string must be easy
> to use, period.
Then you cannot be sure that none of these places is performance critical.
Speed of code writing is unimportant. Only speed of code execution is.
On 31/05/2016 13:09, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 31.05.2016 17:54, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> String class is general class to be used everywhere except in
>> performance needed code.
>>
>> As a general class, should be simple to use with implicit constructors
>> and conversions.
>T
31.05.2016 17:54, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> String class is general class to be used everywhere except in
> performance needed code.
>
> As a general class, should be simple to use with implicit constructors
> and conversions.
This is good, but are you aware how many places in code
31.05.2016 17:34, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> I hardly believe strings can affect performance seriously.
> They are typically not used for objects in deep layers.
Yes, I doubt that these little things can win more than a couple of
percents, but still
they eat common resources such as CPU or memory
On 31/05/2016 12:22, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>Hello, All.
>
>During string class refactoring I tried to declare all constructors
> explicit because
> they are relatively heavy in term of data moving. And it was amazing to see
> in how many
> places in code compiler is implicitly creat
On 05/31/2016 06:22 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> Hello, All.
>
> During string class refactoring I tried to declare all constructors
> explicit because
> they are relatively heavy in term of data moving. And it was amazing to see
> in how many
> places in code compiler is implicitly cr
Hello, All.
During string class refactoring I tried to declare all constructors explicit
because
they are relatively heavy in term of data moving. And it was amazing to see in
how many
places in code compiler is implicitly creating temporary objects. I'm sure that
in some
cases it was
13 matches
Mail list logo
