On 06/01/2016 11:39 AM, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> 01.06.2016 11:34, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>
>> But they provide (unlike gcc) working code. At least on AIX.
> Does GCC fail to create a working code even with -O2 and lower settings?
> I.e. is it optimization issue or something fundamental?
Main problem
01.06.2016 11:34, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> But they provide (unlike gcc) working code. At least on AIX.
Does GCC fail to create a working code even with -O2 and lower settings?
I.e. is it optimization issue or something fundamental?
Dmitry
--
On 05/31/2016 10:59 PM, Egor Pugin wrote:
>> AIX or HPUX with native compilers ...
> Do these platforms have gcc/clang?
> If yes why some native old compilers should be taken into account?
> It's obvious that those compilers almost always will be behind gcc/clang/vc.
>
But they provide (unlike gcc
On 05/31/2016 10:53 PM, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> On 31/05/2016 11:00, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> On 05/31/2016 04:53 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>>> 31.05.2016 15:27, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
But what about AIX or HPUX with native compilers - probably you need to
google carefully
> AIX or HPUX with native compilers ...
Do these platforms have gcc/clang?
If yes why some native old compilers should be taken into account?
It's obvious that those compilers almost always will be behind gcc/clang/vc.
On 31 May 2016 at 22:53, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes
wrote:
> On 31/05/2016
On 31/05/2016 11:00, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> On 05/31/2016 04:53 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>> 31.05.2016 15:27, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>>> But what about AIX or HPUX with native compilers - probably you need to
>>> google carefully re compilers compatibility and tell us how does it look
>>> like t
On 05/31/2016 04:53 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 31.05.2016 15:27, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>> But what about AIX or HPUX with native compilers - probably you need to
>> google carefully re compilers compatibility and tell us how does it look
>> like to use this feature on them. I understand it's cl
31.05.2016 15:27, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> But what about AIX or HPUX with native compilers - probably you need to
> google carefully re compilers compatibility and tell us how does it look
> like to use this feature on them. I understand it's close to unreal to
> test all platforms but docs should b
On 05/31/2016 03:35 PM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 31.05.2016 14:20, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
>> Does MSVC10 count as ancient?
> For me - yes because it is at least three versions behind of top and,
> actually, never
> followed standards.
> MSDN says that it does support move things in contr
31.05.2016 14:20, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> Does MSVC10 count as ancient?
For me - yes because it is at least three versions behind of top and,
actually, never
followed standards.
MSDN says that it does support move things in contrast to deleted members.
I rather worry about exotic platfo
31.05.2016 14:52, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>
> The only reason may be support of ancient compilers as it happened with
> prohibition of
> deleted methods.
Does MSVC10 count as ancient?
Dmitry
--
What NetFlow Analyze
31.05.2016 13:48, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> I don't see why we should prohibit
> their usage if really necessary.
The only reason may be support of ancient compilers as it happened with
prohibition of
deleted methods.
--
WBR, SD.
---
30.05.2016 18:47, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>
> Is it allowed to use move constructor and assignment in Firebird code?
AFAIK, we never use them before, but I don't see why we should prohibit
their usage if really necessary.
Dmitry
--
Hello, All.
Is it allowed to use move constructor and assignment in Firebird code?
--
WBR, SD.
--
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Rev
Hello, All.
Is it allowed to use move constructor and assignment in Firebird code?
--
WBR, SD.
--
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Rev
15 matches
Mail list logo
