On 27-11-2020 09:19, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 11/26/20 10:46 PM, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
I'm currently writing a driver for the R2DBC specification (a new Java
specification for reactive database drivers). Is it OK if I reserve a
new facility code for R2DBC driver errors
26.11.2020 21:46, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
I'm currently writing a driver for the R2DBC specification (a new Java specification for reactive database drivers). Is it OK if I
reserve a new facility code for R2DBC driver errors (similar like I did in the past for Jaybird)?
I see no problem with
On 11/26/20 10:46 PM, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
I'm currently writing a driver for the R2DBC specification (a new Java
specification for reactive database drivers). Is it OK if I reserve a
new facility code for R2DBC driver errors (similar like I did in the
past for Jaybird)?
OK for me.
I'm currently writing a driver for the R2DBC specification (a new Java
specification for reactive database drivers). Is it OK if I reserve a
new facility code for R2DBC driver errors (similar like I did in the
past for Jaybird)?
Mark
--
Mark Rotteveel
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web
