On 17/09/2013 16:44, Evelyne Girard wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> With Firebird 3.0 a secondary condition after a between condition is
> not accepted (due to new Boolean type presumably) whereas it was in
> Firebird 2.5
>
> I do not know if it is « as designed » but I did not see any warning
> about thi
> Although I can't speak to the development side of things, I learned my
> lesson a long time ago about separating conditions with (parenthesis) just
> for clarity. Have you tried to see if it works like that?
Woody: Yes it is working with parenthesis, the problem is not that I don't know
how t
On 17-9-2013 21:44, Evelyne Girard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With Firebird 3.0 a secondary condition after a between condition is not
> accepted (due to new Boolean type presumably) whereas it was in Firebird 2.5
>
> I do not know if it is « as designed » but I did not see any warning
> about this in the re
Hi,
With Firebird 3.0 a secondary condition after a between condition is not
accepted (due to new Boolean type presumably) whereas it was in Firebird 2.5
I do not know if it is < as designed > but I did not see any warning about this
in the release notes.
select * from rdb$database where rdb$re
