On 08/18/11 20:47, Philippe Makowski wrote:
> Dmitry Yemanov [2011-08-18 15:38] :
>> So, unless we know more applications using the "wrong" constant, I think
>> the best way would be to fix kinderbasdb.
> yes
> and in kinterbasdb code we have :
> #ifdef INTERBASE_6_OR_LATER
> SIC(isc_info_db
Dmitry Yemanov [2011-08-18 15:38] :
> So, unless we know more applications using the "wrong" constant, I think
> the best way would be to fix kinderbasdb.
yes
and in kinterbasdb code we have :
#ifdef INTERBASE_6_OR_LATER
SIC(isc_info_db_sql_dialect);
/* Mis-cased version of the above has no
18.08.2011 13:55, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> Hi, who knows what was a reason to comment out following constants in
> consts_pub.h in trunk?
>
> //#define isc_info_db_SQL_dialect 62
> //#define isc_dpb_SQL_dialect 63
> //#define isc_dpb_set_db_SQL_dialect65
>
> Without
> -=| Alex Peshkoff, Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:55:25PM +0400 |=-
> > Hi, who knows what was a reason to comment out following constants in
> > consts_pub.h in trunk?
> >
> > //#define isc_info_db_SQL_dialect 62
> > //#define isc_dpb_SQL_dialect 63
> > //#define isc_dpb_set_
-=| Alex Peshkoff, Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:55:25PM +0400 |=-
> Hi, who knows what was a reason to comment out following constants in
> consts_pub.h in trunk?
>
> //#define isc_info_db_SQL_dialect 62
> //#define isc_dpb_SQL_dialect 63
> //#define isc_dpb_set_db_SQL_dialect
