On 11/03/2021 05:36, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>
> Are these conflicts problematic? Can something be done to prevent them
> (e.g. a lookahead or something)?
>
It's an alert. It's not problematic when they are justified.
Adriano
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourc
On 11-03-2021 02:28, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 10/03/2021 15:42, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
I did some tests and attached is a patch (v3).
It introduces conflicts which I didn't looked yet.
I see now that the introduced reduce/reduce conflict comes from:
insert into tab
On 10-03-2021 19:42, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
I did some tests and attached is a patch (v3).
I created http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-6511
--
Mark Rotteveel
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
On 10-03-2021 19:42, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
I did some tests and attached is a patch (v3).
Thanks.
It introduces conflicts which I didn't looked yet. Looks like it's with
derived tables support.
It allows this funny statement:
(select * from t);
If I'm looking in the standard
On 10/03/2021 15:42, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> On 10/03/2021 05:30, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
>> 06.03.2021 14:53, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>>
>>> Now I wonder, what would be necessary to introduce this alternative?
>>> Would this be a matter of adding the right alternative and adding the
>>>
On 10/03/2021 05:30, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> 06.03.2021 14:53, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
>
>> Now I wonder, what would be necessary to introduce this alternative?
>> Would this be a matter of adding the right alternative and adding the
>> order by and offset/fetch info to the RseNode returned by the q
On 2021-03-10 09:30, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
06.03.2021 14:53, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Now I wonder, what would be necessary to introduce this alternative?
Would this be a matter of adding the right alternative and adding the
order by and offset/fetch info to the RseNode returned by the query
exp
06.03.2021 14:53, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Now I wonder, what would be necessary to introduce this alternative?
Would this be a matter of adding the right alternative and adding the
order by and offset/fetch info to the RseNode returned by the query
expression, or would more be needed?
I'm afra
